Dismissed¶35

Smt Dhanalasmi @ Geetha v. the Divisional Controller

Karnataka HC17 Jul 2025MFA/1077/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

MFA 1077/2018, High Court of Karnataka, decided 17.07.2025 by C.M. Joshi, J.; enhancement of motor accident compensation under Section 173(1) MV Act; challenge to Judgment and Award dated 22.10.2012 in MVC No.84/2010 (Senior Civil Judge, JMFC and Member, MACT, Arsikere) partly allowing claim; appellants Dhanalaksmi @ Geetha, Sachin and minor Dhanush (family of Late Kalegowda); respondents Divisional Controller KSRTC Chikkamagalore, Lakshmamma, Gowramma, Lokeshwari @ Rani, Praveen Kumar, Raghu, Sarojamma; appeal dismissed for non-compliance with Court Order dt.17.07.2025 fixing two-week compliance window; no enhancement granted; no quantum stated.

What did the court decide?

The Court directed that needful be done within two weeks, failing which the appeal would stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. ¶33

Smt Dhanalasmi @ Geetha Vs the Divisional Controller — Motor Accident Claims | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶2

DATED THIS THE 17^TH DAY OF JULY, 2025

¶3

BEFORE

¶4

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. JOSHI

¶5

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1077 OF 2018

¶6

BETWEEN

¶7

1 . SMT DHANALAKSMI @ GEETHA W/O LATE KALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,

¶8

2 . SACHIN S/O LATE KALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS,

¶9

3 . MASTER DHANUSH S/O LATE KALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS,

¶10

SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED BY SMT.DHANALAKSHMI @ GEETHA,

¶11

W/O LATE KALEGOWDA,

¶12

BEING NATURAL MOTHER AS GUARDIAN,

¶13

ALL ARE R/O LAXMIDEVARAHALLI, DHANALAKSHMI ESTATE, SULEKERE POST, KASABA HOBLI, ARSIKERE TALUK. ……..Appellants

¶14

(By Sri. H.T.JAGADEESH, Advocate)

¶15

AND:

¶16

1 . THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER K.S.R.T.C.

¶17

MFA.No.1077/2018 2

¶18

¶19

CHIKKAMAGALORE DIVISION, CHIKKAMAGALORE.

¶20

2 . SMT LAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE GIDDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, R/O LAXMIDEVARAHALLI, DHANALAXMI ESTATE, SULEKERE HOBLI, KASABA HOBLI, ARSIKERE TALUK.

¶21

3 . SMT GOWRAMMA W/O KALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,

¶22

4 . LOKESHWARI @ RANI D/O KALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,

¶23

5 . PRAVEEN KUMAR S/O KALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,

¶24

6 . RAGHU S/O KALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,

¶25

RESPONDENT NOS.3 TO 6 ARE R/O DASEGOWDA STREET KOTE, HOLENARASHIPURA, HASSAN DISTRICT.

¶26

7 . SAROJAMMA W/O LATE KALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O AKKANAPURA VILLAGE, KATTYA HOBLI,

¶27

HASSAN DISTRICT. …Respondents

¶28

MFA.No.1077/2018 3

¶29

¶30

This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed under Section 173(1) of MV Act against the Judgment and Award dated 22.10.2012 passed in MVC No.84/2010 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, JMFC and Member, MACT, Arsikere, partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation.

¶31

This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following:

¶32

ORAL ORDER

¶33

Needful to be done within two weeks, failing which, the appeal stands dismissed without further reference to the Court.

¶34

Sd/JUDGE

¶35

NOTE: Court Order dt.17.07.2025 not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed.

¶36

COPY