Dismissed¶34

Smt. Nalini v. Smt. Anitha

Karnataka HC2 Jun 2025HRRP/15/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

HRRP No. 15 of 2020; NC: 2025:KHC:18496; High Court of Karnataka; Justice H.P. Sandesh; order dated 02-06-2025; Karnataka Rent Act 1999 Sections 46(1) and 43; HRC No.56/2017; Chief Judge, Court of Small Causes; dismissal for non-compliance of office objections; non-payment of Rs.500 cost; condonation of delay; non-prosecution; Nalini/Ramadev legal representatives vs Anitha and Govindaraju; Bengaluru.

What did the court decide?

The HRRP is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections and non-payment of the cost imposed. ¶34

Smt. Nalini Vs Smt. Anitha — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC:18496 HRRP No. 15 of 2020

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 2^ND DAY OF JUNE, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

¶7

HOUSE RENT REV. PETITION NO.15 OF 2020

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SMT. NALINI W/O RAMDEV LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF 1^ST PETITIONER

¶10

SHRI. K. RAMADEV S/O LATE SHRI KRISHNAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.1482 4^TH ‘B’ CROSS, 2^ND STAGE WEST OF CHORD ROAD MAHALAKSHMIPURAM LAYOUT BENGALURU-560 086.

¶11

Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

SHRI. VIVEK R, S/O SHRI. K. RAMADEV AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS RESIDENT AT NO.5 8^TH MAIN ROAD OPP. BYRAPPA ENCLAVE RAJAJINAGAR BENGALURU – 560 010.

¶13

SHRI. VINOD DEV R, S/O SHRI. K RAMADEV AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS RESIDENT AT NO.5, 8^TH MAIN ROAD OPP BYRAPPA ENCLAVE RAJAJINAGAR BENGALURU-560 010.

¶14

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:18496 HRRP No. 15 of 2020

¶15

HC-KAR

¶16

SMT. SHAILA W/O SHRI. JAIPRAKASH D/O M. NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS

¶17

PRESENTLY RESIDING AT CANADA

¶18

REPRESENTED BY HER GPA HOLDER SHRI. K. RAMADEV S/O LATE SHRI. KRISHNAMURTHY 1^ST PETITIONER IN THIS APPEAL AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS

¶19

…PETITIONERS

¶20

(BY SRI. SHANMUKHAPPA, ADVOCATE)

¶21

AND:

¶22

SMT. ANITHA W/O SHRI. PANI, CHAMUNDI AUDIO AND ELECTRONICS OLD NO.5, NEW NO.5/1 2^ND MAIN, NOW 5^TH MAIN NEAR SUN RAISE CIRCLE OKALIPURAM (SRI RAMPURA) BENGALURU-560 021.

¶23

SHRI. K. GOVINDARAJU S/O LATE SHRI. M. KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS R/O NO.5, 5^TH MAIN HANUMANTHPURA SRIRAMPURAM BENGALURU-560 021.

¶24

…RESPONDENTS

¶25

(BY SRI. N.DEVARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R2 VIDE ORDER DATED 29.07.2024 APPEAL AGAINST R1 IS DISMISSED)

¶26

THIS HRRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 46(1) OF KARNATAKA RENT ACT, 1999 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 30.11.2018 PASSED IN HRC No.56/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE

¶27

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:18496 HRRP No. 15 of 2020

¶28

HC-KAR

¶29

CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, STOPPING THE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN THE PRESENT CASE ACTING UNDER SECTION 43 OF THE KARNATAKA RENT ACT, 1999.

¶30

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶31

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

¶32

ORAL ORDER

¶33

This matter is listed for non-compliance of office objections on three occasions. Inspite of granting opportunity on three occasions to comply with the office objections raised on I.A.No.1/2024 i.e., on 12.11.2024, 21.11.2024 and 19.12.2024, office objections are not complied. Further, even though the delay in filing this revision petition was condoned on cost of Rs.500/-, cost is also not paid and not pursuing the matter diligently. Hence, it appears that the revision petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter.

¶34

Accordingly, the HRRP is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections and non-payment of cost.

¶35

Sd/(H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE

¶36

ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1

Smt. Nalini v. Smt. Anitha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Nalini v. Smt. Anitha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri. Manjanna M.K., Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Murali Vs State by Channarayapatna Police

Mrs N Padmini Vs Superintendent of Police

Muddagangamma Vs Smt. Anusuyamma

Sri K R Narasimhamurthy Vs Sri K R Thimmaiah

Shivalingaswamy Vs Special Land Acquisition Officer