Dismissed¶31

Smt. Lakshmi v. Smt. Mariamma

Karnataka HC14 Oct 2025CRP/99/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRP No. 99 of 2018; NC: 2025:KHC:40741; High Court of Karnataka; V Srishananda J.; Section 115 CPC; rejection of plaint; IA No.4; O.S.No.346/2012; Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Anekal; order dated 7.12.2017; withdrawal with liberty reserved; Kum. Geetha v. Nanjunadaswamy 2023 Live Law SC 940; dismissed as withdrawn; no merits adjudicated.

What did the court decide?

Liberty reserved to the revision petitioner to raise all contentions before the learned Trial Court in O.S.No.346/2012 without prejudice. ¶31

Smt. Lakshmi Vs Smt. Mariamma — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC:40741 CRP No. 99 of 2018

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 14^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 99 OF 2018

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SMT. LAKSHMI W/O. SARVANASINGH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT NO.875/A/1, 4^TH MAIN, 1^ST CROSS, PIPELINE ROAD, NEAR MATHA SCHOOL ROAD, YESHWANTHPUR, BANGALORE - 560 022.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. SACHIN V.R., ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶13

SMT. MARIAMMA W/O. MARIYAPPA D/O. LATE KEMPEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT NAGADSANDRA VILLAGE C.R. PALYA POST DANKANIKOTE TALUK KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT - 635 107

¶14

SMT. RUDRAMBIKE W/O. LATE H.P. RAMESH D/O. LATE KEMPEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/A NO.1855 11^TH MAIN, 39^TH CROSS 4^TH BLOCK JAYANAGAR BANGALORE - 560 041

¶15

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:40741 CRP No. 99 of 2018

¶16

HC-KAR

¶17

SMT. CHANDRAKALA W/O. UMAPATHI D/O. LATE KEMPEGOWDA R/AT B.S. COMPOUND ASHOKA ROAD SAKALESHAPURA HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 134

¶18

…RESPONDENTS

¶19

(BY SRI. B.C. VENKATESH, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3)

¶20

THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 7.12.2017 PASSED ON IA NO.4 IN OS NO.346/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL DISMISSING THE IA NO.4 FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT.

¶21

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶22

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

After addressing the arguments for some time, learned

¶25

counsel for the revision petitioner files a memo. Memo reads as under:

¶26

“The undersigned respectfully prays that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to dismiss this petition as withdrawn reserving the liberty to raise all the contentions before the learned Trial Court in O.S.No.346/2012 without prejudice, as per the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court reported in 2023 Live Law SC 940 in the case of Kum. Geetha v. Nanjunadaswamy, in the justice and equity.”

¶27

NC: 2025:KHC:40741 CRP No. 99 of 2018

¶28

¶29

HC-KAR

¶30

Placing the memo on record, revision petition stands

¶31

dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

¶32

Sd/(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

¶33