Sri K Krishna Murthy v. Smt Mahalakshmi

Karnataka HC25 Nov 2025CRP/331/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRP No. 331 of 2019; Karnataka HC; V Srishananda J.; dismissed as infructuous; memo dated 25.11.2025; S.115 CPC revision; against order dated 26.04.2019 on IA No.1 in AS No.102/2014; VI Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge Bengaluru; Order XVI Rule 1 read with Sec.151 CPC; direction; petitioner K Krishna Murthy; respondents Mahalakshmi, K Anjaneya Murthy, K Radhakrishna; advocates Sathya M., K.V. Narasimhan, B.M. Arun.

What did the court decide?

None — the revision petition itself was dismissed as having become infructuous on the petitioner's memo dated 25.11.2025. ¶35, 36

Sri K Krishna Murthy Vs Smt Mahalakshmi — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

NC: 2025:KHC:48888 CRP No. 331 of 2019

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 25^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 331 OF 2019

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI K KRISHNA MURTHY S/O LATE K N KANTHARAJU AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/A NO.1088, 5^TH BLOCK, 66^TH CROSS, 18^TH B MAIN, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 010

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. SATHYA M., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. K.V. NARASIMHAN, ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

SMT MAHALAKSHMI

¶14

Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶15

W/O LATE SRI K N KANTHARAJ AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS R/AT MIG 115, KHB COLONY 1^ST FLOOR, 80 FEET ROAD BASAVESHWARANAGAR BANGALORE - 560 010

¶16

SRI K ANJANEYA MURTHY S/O LATE SRI K N KANTHARAJ R/A NO.15/3, 3^RD FLOOR, SRIKANTHAN LAYOUT CRESENT ROAD, HIGH GROUNDS, BANGALORE - 560 010

¶17

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:48888 CRP No. 331 of 2019

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

SRI K RADHAKRISHNA

¶20

S/O LATE SRI K N KANTHARAJ AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT MIG 115, KHB COLONY 1^ST FLOOR, 80 FEET ROAD BASAVESHWARANAGAR BANGALORE - 560 010

¶21

…RESPONDENTS

¶22

(BY SRI. B.M. ARUN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 VIDE ORDER DATED 20.11.2019)

¶23

THIS CRP IS FILED U/S.115 OF CPC AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 26.04.2019 PASSED ON IA NO.1 IN AS NO.102/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE VI ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY REJECTING THE IA NO.1 FILED UNDER ORDER XVI RULE 1 READ WITH SEC.151 OF CPC FOR DIRECTION.

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶25

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶26

ORAL ORDER

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo

¶28

dated 25.11.2025 stating that the revision petition has become infructuous, which reads as under:

¶29

"The petitioner in the above petition respectfully prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to dismiss the