Dismissed¶37

Ashok Varma v. a N Subash Chandra

Karnataka HC10 Oct 2025CRP/25/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC CRP No. 25 of 2017 (SC), decided 10.10.2025 by V Srishananda J: revision petition dismissed as withdrawn. Petitioner: Ashok Varma (Nitya Kaligotla Adv. for Arun Sri Kumar Adv.). Sole respondent: A N Subash Chandra (A.M. Suresh Reddy Adv.), whose death during proceedings was reported by memo dated 19.01.2023. Petition challenged judgment and decree dated 03.12.2016 in S.C. No. 952/2016 of the XVI Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes, Bengaluru, partly decreeing the plaintiff's money-recovery suit and the defendant's counter claim. Filed under S.18 Karnataka Small Cause Courts Act. No cases cited; no monetary quantum stated.

What did the court decide?

Petition permitted to be withdrawn and accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. ¶37

Ashok Varma Vs a N Subash Chandra — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:40059 CRP No. 25 of 2017

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 10^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 25 OF 2017 (SC)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

ASHOK VARMA

¶10

S/O. V. ANANDA VARMA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO.503, BLOCK, 04, SUN CITY APARTMENTS SARJAPURA OUTER RING ROAD, IBLUR HSR POST, BENGALURU - 560 102.

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SMT. NITYA KALIGOTLA, ADVOCATE FOR

¶13

Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

SRI. ARUN SRI KUMAR, ADVOCATE)

¶15

AND:

¶16

A N SUBASH CHANDRA S/O LATE NARASIMHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT FLAT NO. 105, RADIANCE BLOCK - 20 SUN CITY APARTMENTS, SARJAPUR OUTER RING ROAD,

¶17

¶18

NC: 2025:KHC:40059 CRP No. 25 of 2017

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

IBLUR, HSR POST, BENGALURU - 560 102.

¶21

…RESPONDENT

¶22

(BY SRI. A.M. SURESH REDDY, ADVOCATE)

¶23

THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE KARNATAKA SMALL CAUSE COURTS ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.12.2016 PASSED IN SC NO.952/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE XVI ADDL. JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT OF THE PLAINTIFF THEREIN FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY AND PARTLY DECREEING THE COUNTER CLAIM OF THE DEFENDANT THEREIN FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY.

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶25

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶26

ORAL ORDER

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo

¶28

which reads as under:

¶29

"1. The captioned petition was filed challenging the judgment and decree dated 03.12.2016 in S.C. No. 952 of 2016 passed by the Addl. Judge, Court Of Small Causes, Bengaluru.

¶30

NC: 2025:KHC:40059 CRP No. 25 of 2017

¶31

¶32

HC-KAR

¶33

2. During the course of the present proceedings, the counsel for the Respondent has filed a memo dated 19.01.2023 reporting the death of the sole Respondent Mr. A N Subash Chandra.

¶34

3. In view of the death of the sole Respondent, the Petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition.

¶35

Hence it is humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to dispose of the present petition as withdrawn, in the interests of justice and equity.

¶36

Placing the memo on record, the revision petition is

¶37

dismissed as withdrawn.

¶38

Sd/(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

¶39

SNC CT-SG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2

Ashok Varma v. a N Subash Chandra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Varma v. a N Subash Chandra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri. K S Samiulla Vs Sri. Syed Mustafa

Shalini Vs Vijaykumar

Swetha C B Vs Chandan v

B Allabakash Vs Sri Nawab

Dr. S Chandrashekar Vs Satish N

Sri M Muniappa Vs Smt Chikkamuninanjamma