Disposed¶31

M Uday v. Sri Shivaraju

Karnataka HC13 Sept 2025CRL.RP/246/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Crl.R.P. No. 246/2020 (Lok Adalat No. 2220/2025), High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, National Lok Adalat order dated 13.09.2025; cheque dishonour case under Section 138 NI Act; conviction dated 28.02.2019 in C.C.No.191/2014 by Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Nagamangala under Section 255(2) CrPC; revision under Sections 397/401 Cr.P.C.; joint memo settlement between accused-petitioner M Uday and complainant Shivaramju; acquittal of petitioner; withdrawal of complainant's conditional deposit of Rs.60,000/- with accrued interest; disposed by compromise.

What did the court decide?

Revision petition closed pursuant to the compromise between the parties; petitioner acquitted for the offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I. Act. ¶31

M Uday Vs Sri Shivaraju — Cheque Dishonour | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 13^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025

¶5

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶6

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM

¶7

¶8

SRI. VENKATESH P. DALWAI, MEMBER

¶9

Crl.R.P. No. 246/2020

¶10

(Lok Adalat No. 2220/2025)

¶11

BETWEEN

¶12

1 . M UDAY

¶13

SON OF LATE CHANDRASHEKAR

¶14

AGED 58 YEARS R/AT NO 463, 64^TH CROSS 5TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR BENGLURU-560 010.

¶15

...PETITIONER

¶16

(BY SRI. BALAKRISHNA .K, ADVOCATE)

¶17

AND

¶18

1 . SRI. SHIVARAJU S/O HUCHEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS MALLENAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, NAGAMANGALA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571 432.

¶19

…RESPONDENT

¶20

(BY SRI. G.M. SRINIVASA REDDY, ADVOCATE)

¶21

¶22

THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT NAGAMANGALA IN C.C.NO.191/2014 JUDGMENT ON 28.02.2019 U/S.255(2) CRPC THE ACCUSED/PETITIONER IS CONVICTED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.138 OF NI ACT AND ETC.

¶23

THIS CRL.RP. COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.

¶24

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶25

The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent are present and the respective parties are also present.

¶26

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective

¶27

parties.

¶28

The petitioner and the respondent along with their respective counsel have filed the joint memo for settlement. The learned counsel for the complainant submits that complainant has no objection to record settlement subject to permitting him to withdraw conditional deposit of Rs.60,000/- with accrued interest.

¶29

¶30