Dismissed¶24

Basanagouda Channappagouda Guadasalmani v. Veeresh Shanmukhappa Kundagol

Karnataka HC22 Sept 2025CRL.RP/100166/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench (Justice S.Vishwajith Shetty, 22/09/2025), CRL.RP No. 100166 of 2020 (397(Cr.PC)/438(BNSS)); Section 138 NI Act cheque dishonour conviction in C.C. No.1139/2016 confirmed by Crl. Appeal No.32/2019; revision dismissed as abated due to petitioner's death on 02.04.2022; withdrawal of trial-court deposit permitted to respondent.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to the respondent to withdraw the amount, if any, deposited by the petitioner before the trial Court, upon producing necessary documents in support of his identity. ¶24

Basanagouda Channappagouda Guadasalmani Vs Veeresh… — Cheque Dishonour | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC-D:12867 CRL.RP No. 100166 of 2020

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 22^ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY

¶6

CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 100166 OF 2020 (397(Cr.PC)/438(BNSS))

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

BASANAGOUDA CHANNAPPAGOUDA GUADASALMANI, AGE 45 YEARS, OCC: AGRICLTURE, R/O: LAKKUNDI, TQ: & DIST: GADAG-582115.

¶9

… PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. SADIQ N.GOODWALA, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

VEERESH SHANMUKHAPPA KUNDAGOL, AGE 46 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: NEAR BHUMAREDDY CIRCLE, GADAG-582101

¶13

… RESPONDENT

¶14

(BY SRI.GANESH RAIBAGI, ADVOCATE)

¶15

Digitally signed byRAKESH S RAKESHSHARIHAR HARIHARLocation:HIGHCOURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH

¶16

THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH SECTION 401 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO CALL FOR THE RELEVANT RECORDS IN C.C. NO.1139/2016 DATED 21/02/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE I-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC-I, GADAG AND RECORDS IN CRL. APPEAL NO.32/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE I-ADDL. PRL. FAMILY COURT, GADAG DATED 01/02/2020 AND ALLOW THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION, BY SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE IN C.C. NO.1139/2016 DATED 21/02/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE I-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC-I, GADAG BY CONFIRMING IN CRL. APPEAL NO.32/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE I-ADDL. PRL. FAMILY COURT, GADAG DATED 01/02/2020 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I. ACT.

¶17

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

¶19

NC: 2025:KHC-D:12867 CRL.RP No. 100166 of 2020

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

ORAL ORDER

¶22

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY)

¶23

It is submitted before this Court that the

¶24

petitioner has died on 02.04.2022. Therefore, this petition stands dismissed as abated .

¶25

The respondent is permitted to withdraw the amount deposited by the petitioner, if any before the trial Court after producing the necessary documents in support of his identity.

¶26

Sd/(S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE

¶27

VNP / CT: BCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 78

Basanagouda Channappagouda Guadasalmani v. Veeresh Shanmukhappa Kundagol

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Basanagouda Channappagouda Guadasalmani v. Veeresh Shanmukhappa Kundagol

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Naseem Begum Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Shashank Hardwares Vs Sri Parameshappa

Smt Rashida Begum W/O Gulabmohmed Babakhan Vs the State of Karnataka through

Shridhar S/O. Danappa Shirguppi Vs State of Karnataka by

Mohammad Sakib Alias Sakib S/O. Liyakatali Dongarakhe Vs the State of Karnataka

Saddamhussain Alias Husainsab S/O Mehaboobsab Khairati Vs the State of Karnataka