Dismissed¶38

Sri Hamsaraja v. State by

Karnataka HC10 Sept 2025CRL.P/8735/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for default; non-prosecution; no representation for petitioners; non-compliance with office objections; conditional order dated 16.12.2024; Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing petition; C.C.No.16585/2021; Cr.No.88/2021; Kyathasandra Police Station; IPC Sections 323, 341, 342, 504 r/w 34; Principal Civil Judge and J.M.F.C. Tumakuru; High Court of Karnataka; J.M. Khazi J.; NC: 2025:KHC:35896.

What did the court decide?

The petition is dismissed for default: the petitioners made no representation (including in the afternoon session) and did not comply with office objections despite the conditional order dated 16.12.2024, and the Court found that they were not interested in prosecuting the matter. ¶38

Sri Hamsaraja Vs State by — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:35896 CRL.P No. 8735 of 2023

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8735 OF 2023

¶7

(482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS))

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI HAMSARAJA

¶10

S/O LATE RAMACHANDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS

¶11

SMT JAYAMMA

¶12

W/O HAMSARAJA

¶13

AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS

¶14

SRI SHASHI S/O HAMSARAJA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS

¶15

Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶16

SRI SURESH S/O HAMSARAJA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS

¶17

ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF BATAWADI, TUMAKURU TOWN, TUMAKURU PERMANENT ADDRESS: THIMMANAHALLI VILLAGE, LAKKANAHALLI POST HULIKUNTE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT, KARNATAKA

¶18

…PETITIONERS

¶19

(BY SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA D, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)

¶20

¶21

NC: 2025:KHC:35896 CRL.P No. 8735 of 2023

¶22

HC-KAR

¶23

AND:

¶24

STATE BY

¶25

KYATHASANDRA POLICE STATION

¶26

SMT PARVATHAMMA W/O NARAYANAPPA T R AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, NO 172, SRINIVASA NILAYA, BATAWADI, TUMAKURU TOWN, TUMAKURU, KARNATAKA

¶27

…RESPONDENTS

¶28

(BY SMT.ANITHA GIRISH, HCGP)

¶29

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.16585/2021 ARISING OUT OF CR.NO.88/2021 REGISTERED BY RESPONDENT NO.1 POLICE FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 323, 341, 342, 504 R/W 34 OF IPC PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., TUMAKURU.

¶30

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI

¶31

ORAL ORDER

¶32

No representation for petitioners.

¶33

No representation for petitioners even in the afternoon session.

¶34

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:35896 CRL.P No. 8735 of 2023

¶35

HC-KAR

¶36

Vide order dated 16.12.2024, a conditional order was

¶37

passed by granting ten days time to comply with the office objections, failing which necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of the petition. Despite the same, the office objections are not complied with.

¶38

It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed for default.

¶39

In view of the disposal of petition, pending application/s, if any, stands disposed off, as no separate order is required.

¶40

Sd/(J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE

¶41

ASN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11

Sri Hamsaraja v. State by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Hamsaraja v. State by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Shivamma Vs the Karnataka Lokayuktha

Shivakumar Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. M Goutham Chand Vs State of Karnataka

Sharan Raj Vs the State of Karnataka

Mrs. Rafia Sultana Vs the State

Mr. Ananda Vs State of Karnataka by Pension Mohalla Police Station