Dismissed¶29

Sri Udaya Kumar @ Udaya v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC8 Jul 2025CRL.P/8465/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru; CRL.P No. 8465 of 2022; Justice J.M.Khazi; order dated 08.07.2025; Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing petition; C.C.No.7751/2020; I Additional Civil Judge and J.M.F.C., Anekal; Crime No.137/2020, Bannerghatta Police Station; petitioner Udaya Kumar @ Udaya; respondent Govind B.T., Police Officer; petition dismissed for default / non-prosecution; conditional order dated 30.06.2025; pending applications disposed.

What did the court decide?

As the petitioner took no steps despite the conditional order dated 30.06.2025 granting one week time, and made no representation in either session, the petitioner appears not interested in prosecuting the petition; the petition is therefore dismissed for default. ¶29

Sri Udaya Kumar @ Udaya Vs the State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:24731 CRL.P No. 8465 of 2022

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 8^TH DAY OF JULY, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8465 OF 2022

¶8

(482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS))

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SRI. UDAYA KUMAR @ UDAYA, S/O MADAPPA @ MADA NAIKA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/A NEAR POST OFFICE, JANATHA COLONY, BANNERGHATTA, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-560 083

¶11

AND ALSO AT NO.4, MADAPPANA DODDI, BANNERGHATTA, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-560 083.

¶12

…PETITIONER

¶13

Digitally signed by REKHA R

¶14

Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶15

(BY SRI. MURTHY NAYAK B L., ADVOCATE)

¶16

AND:

¶17

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY BANNERGHATTA POLICE STATION BENGALURU, REPRESENTED BY SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE-560 001.

¶18

SRI GOVIND B. T. POLICE OFFICER, BANNERGHATTA P.S., JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT,

¶19

…RESPONDENTS

¶20

(BY SRI.VINAY MAHADEVAIAH, HCGP FOR R1)

¶21

¶22

NC: 2025:KHC:24731 CRL.P No. 8465 of 2022

¶23

HC-KAR

¶24

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.7751/2020 ON THE FILE OF I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., ANEKAL (CR.NO.137/2020 OF BANNERGHATTA POLICE STATION) AGAINST THE PETITIONER AND ETC.

¶25

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶26

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI

¶27

ORAL ORDER

¶28

In the morning session, there is no representation for the petitioner. Even in the afternoon session also there is no representation.

¶29

This petition is of the year 2022. On 30.06.2025 a conditional order was passed granting one week time to do the needful, failing which, petition would be dismissed. Despite the said order steps are not taken. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for default.

¶30

¶31

NC: 2025:KHC:24731 CRL.P No. 8465 of 2022

¶32

HC-KAR

¶33