Dismissed¶27

Smt. Jayashree R. Urs v. Sri. H. S. Nagesh Preetham

Karnataka HC29 Jul 2025CRL.A/781/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRL.A No. 781 of 2022, High Court of Karnataka (Justice S Rachaiiah, 29-07-2025): criminal appeal under S. 378(4) Cr.P.C. against acquittal dated 02.02.2022 in C.C.No.1441/2021 (IV Addl. JMFC, Mysore) dismissed for non-compliance of office objections / non-prosecution; no merits decided; no cases cited; no quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

The appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution, the appellant's counsel having failed to comply with office objections despite sufficient opportunities. ¶27

Smt. Jayashree R. Urs Vs Sri. H. S. Nagesh Preetham — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

NC: 2025:KHC:29083 CRL.A No. 781 of 2022

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 29^TH DAY OF JULY, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 781 OF 2022 (A)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SMT. JAYASHREE R. URS D/O. LATE M.P.R. URS AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT NO. 1-A, 8TH MAIN SJH ROAD, VIDYARANYAPURAM MYSORE …APPELLANT

¶10

(BY SRI. GANESHA K., ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by SREEDHARAN BANGALORE SUSHMA LAKSHMI Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶13

SRI. H. S. NAGESH PREETHAM S/O. LATE H. S. SHANKARALINGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS NO.85, NAGALAKSHMI SHANKARALAYA SAHUKAR CHENNAIAH ROAD 4^TH STAGE, T. K. LAYOUT KUVEMPUNAGAR, MYSORE-560 009

¶14

SMT. CHANDRA URS WIFE OF LATE M.P.R. URS AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS NO.1B, UPSTAIRS, 8^TH MAIN

¶15

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:29083 CRL.A No. 781 of 2022

¶16

HC-KAR

¶17

SJH ROAD, VIDYARANYAPURAM

¶18

MYSORE-560 009

¶19

SMT. R. KANCHANAGANGA D/O. LATE M.P.R. URS AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS RESIDING ALSO AT NO.1B, UPSTAIRS 8^TH MAIN, SJH ROAD VIDYARANYAPURAM MYSORE-560 009

¶20

SMT. ARUNDHATHI R. URS W/O. RAKESH J. RAO AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/ALSO AT NO. 1B, UPSTARIS, 8^TH MAIN SJH ROAD, VIDYARANYAPURAM MYSORE-560 009 …RESPONDENTS

¶21

THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4) OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS CRL.A BY SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF ACQUITTAL DATED 02.02.2022, PASSED BY THE LEARNED IV ADDL.JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, MYSORE IN C.C.NO.1441/2021.

¶22

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶23

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

¶24

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:29083 CRL.A No. 781 of 2022

¶25

HC-KAR

¶26

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶27

Case called out. The matter is listed for non-compliance of office objections for fourth time. However, learned counsel for appellant has failed to comply with the office objections despite giving sufficient opportunities. Therefore, it appears that he is not interested to proceed with the case. Hence, it is appropriate to dismiss the appeal for non-compliance of office objections.

¶28

Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed for non-

¶29

prosecution.

¶30

Sd/(S RACHAIAH) JUDGE

¶31

¶32

List No.: 2 Sl No.: 7

Smt. Jayashree R. Urs v. Sri. H. S. Nagesh Preetham

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Jayashree R. Urs v. Sri. H. S. Nagesh Preetham

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sri D Chikkanna Vs Sri Vishwanath

Manjula G Vs H P Umadevi

Ayaz Ali Vs Mohammed Basheer

Smt Shashikala Aithal Vs Sri D J Partha Sarathy

Chandrappa Vs Ananda S

Sri Chandrakanta Suvarna Vs Smt Babitha S Nayak