Dismissed¶33

Syed Jameer @ Jameer v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC3 Jun 2025CRL.P/7122/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; CRL.P No. 7122 of 2025; decided 03-06-2025; S Vishwajith Shetty, J. Regular bail petition under S.439 CrPC / S.483 BNSS in Spl.C.No.706/2025 (Cr.No.535/2024, Peenya Police Station) for offences under S.137(2), S.137(1)(b), S.65(1) BNS and S.4 POCSO Act; dismissed as not pressed with liberty to renew after examination of the victim girl; prosecution and Trial Court to examine victim on priority. Keywords: regular bail, POCSO, BNS 137(2), BNS 137(1)(b), BNS 65(1), FTSC-II, not pressed, victim examination.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to renew his bail application after the victim girl is examined before the Trial Court. ¶33

Syed Jameer @ Jameer Vs the State of Karnataka — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:18651 CRL.P No. 7122 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 3^RD DAY OF JUNE, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7122 OF 2025

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SYED JAMEER @ JAMEER, S/O AMEER JAN, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, RESIDING AT KAMBEGOWDA NAGARA, GANGONDANAHALLI, DASSANAPAURA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 073. ALSO AT CHOLLAMBALLI VILLAGE, GULURU HOBLI, TUMAKUR TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 118.

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI. HARISH KUMAR M.C, ADVOCATE)

¶13

Digitally signed by NANDINI D Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

AND:

¶15

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY PEENYA POLICE, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 560 001.

¶16

SRI. MALLESH, S/O MAYANNA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT GANGONDAHALLI, SHANTI NAGAR DASANAPURA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK,

¶17

¶18

NC: 2025:KHC:18651 CRL.P No. 7122 of 2025

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

BANGALORE DISTRICT - 560 073.

¶21

…RESPONDENTS

¶22

(BY SRI. RANGASWAMY R, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. AMBRISHA, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

¶23

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 OF CR.P.C (U/S 483 BNSS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON REGULAR BAIL IN SPL.C.NO.706/2025 IN CR.NO.535/2024, FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 137(2), 137(1)(b), 65(1) OF BNS, U/S 4 OF POCSO ACT, AGAINST THE PETITIONER FILED BY THE RESPONDENT PEENYA P.S., PENDING ON THE FILE OF ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, FTSC-II.

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶25

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

¶26

ORAL ORDER

¶27

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the

¶28

matter for some time, submits that at this stage, petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to renew his bail application after the victim girl is examined before the Trial Court.

¶29

¶30

NC: 2025:KHC:18651 CRL.P No. 7122 of 2025

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record.

¶33

Petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for. It is needless to state that the prosecution as well as the Trial Court shall make endeavors to examine the victim girl on priority.

¶34

Sd/(S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE

¶35

NG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 63 CT: BHK

Syed Jameer @ Jameer v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Syed Jameer @ Jameer v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santhosh Kumar S Vs State of Karnataka

Mr. Avi Gupta Vs State of Karnataka

Monisha Naidu C Vs State of Karnataka

Kodi Nagesh Kamath Vs State by

Smt Kalavathi Alias Kalavathi Vs State of Karnataka

Sri Mahesh Ratanshi Gandhi Vs State of Karnataka by