Dismissed¶25

Tejas @ Kariya v. State by

Karnataka HC17 Sept 2025CRL.P/7006/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC, CRL.P No. 7006 of 2023, decided 17-09-2025 by Justice J.M. Khazi; petition under S.482 Cr.P.C./S.528 BNSS by Tejas @ Kariya (accused no.1) against respondents State by Hosakote Police Station and Manjunatha.N; challenged order dated 22.06.2023 on Sec. 311 Cr.P.C. application and sought recall/cross-examination of PW.3 Yoges and PW.6 Vinay Subramanya in S.C.No.369/2019 before 8th Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural; dismissed as infructuous after counsel's withdrawal memo; pending applications disposed off; no quantum, no precedents discussed.

What did the court decide?

In view of the memo filed by learned counsel seeking permission to withdraw (on the ground that the trial Court has already disposed of the matter), the petition is dismissed for having become infructuous. ¶25

Tejas @ Kariya Vs State by — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:37022 CRL.P No. 7006 of 2023

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7006 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS))

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

TEJAS @ KARIYA AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS S/O CHANDRASHEKAR, R/O NO. 244, RAMAMANDIRA ROAD, CHIKKATIGALARAPETE, HOSKOTE TOWN, THIRUMENAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 003.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. BASAWA PRASAD KUNALE., ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶13

STATE BY HOSAKOTE POLICE STATION REPRESENTED BY SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT COMPOUND, BANGALORE - 560 001.

¶14

SRI. MANJUNATHA.N, S/O NARAYANA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O HUSKURU KODI, BIDRAHALLI HOBLI - 560 067. BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU CITY.

¶15

…RESPONDENTS

¶16

(BY SRI.B.LAKSHMAN, HCGP FOR R1)

¶17

¶18

NC: 2025:KHC:37022 CRL.P No. 7006 of 2023

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC PRAYING TO 1) SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 22.06.2023 ON SEC. 311 CR.P.C. APPLICATION FILED BY THE ACCUSED NO.1 / PETITIONER IN S.C.NO.369/2019 PENDING BEFORE THE LD. 8TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL. 2) RECALL THE PROSECUTION WITNESS PW.3/K YOGES S/O KRISHNAMURTHY AND PW.6 VINAY 2 SUBRAMANYA S/O BALAKRISHNA FOR FURTHER CROSSEXAMINATION BY ACCUSED NO.1 / PETITIONER.

¶21

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶22

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition on the ground that already the trial Court has disposed of the matter and as such this petition has become infructuous.

¶25