Dismissed¶37

Syed Shahabuddin v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC16 Oct 2025CRL.P/6570/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC, M.I. Arun J., 16-10-2025, CRL.P No. 6570 of 2020 (NC: 2025:KHC:41401). Quashing of FIR under S.482 Cr.P.C.: FIR Crime No.26/2019, Kadugondanahalli Police Station, Bengaluru, offence u/S.498-A r/w S.34 IPC, pending before XI A.C.M.M. Mayo Hall; complainant/respondent Shazima Begum Siddique (wife) vs petitioners Syed Shahabuddin, Bibi Jan, Naseema, Abdul Azeem, Syed Fazlullah, Syed Jaffar @ Mustakh. Chargesheet filed after petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the chargesheet. Matrimonial/domestic dispute; no precedent engaged.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal of the petition as withdrawn at the request of petitioners' counsel, with liberty reserved to challenge the chargesheet in accordance with law. ¶37

Syed Shahabuddin Vs State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:41401 CRL.P No. 6570 of 2020

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 16^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6570 OF 2020

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SYED SHAHABUDDIN S/O LATE A.R.NAWAB AGED ABOUT 38YEARS PRESENTLY R/AT P.O.BOX NO.564 3^RD INDUSTRIAL ARAEA, AL KHARJ ROAD RIYADH, SAUDI ARABIA, PIN CODE-11383.

¶10

SMT. BIBI JAN W/O LATE A.R.NAWAB AGEDA BOUT 61 YAERS

¶11

SMT. NASEEMA W/O SYED JAFFER AGED ABOUT 42 YAERS

¶12

Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

ABDUL AZEEM S/O SYED MAHUDDIN AGED AJBOUT 64 YEARS

¶14

SYED FAZLULLAH S/O LATE A.R.NAWAB AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS

¶15

SYED JAFFAR @ MUSTAKH PETITIONER NOs.2 TO 6 ARE RESIDENT OF 1^ST CROSS BARLINE MAIN ROAD TUMKUR-572 101.

¶16

¶17

NC: 2025:KHC:41401 CRL.P No. 6570 of 2020

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

AND ALSO ALL R/AT NO.38 3^RD CROSS, MUNISWAMAPPA LAYOUT HIDAYATH NAGAR, K.G.HALLI BENGALURU.

¶20

…PETITIONERS

¶21

(BY SRI. MOHAMED ZULFIKHAR AHAMED, ADVOCATE)

¶22

AND:

¶23

STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE S.H.O. KADUGONDANAHALLI POLICE STATION BENGALURU CITY REP. BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING ANNEXE BENGALURU-560 001.

¶24

SHAZIMA BEGUM SIDDIQUE W/O SYED SHAHBUDDIN ABDUL RASHEED NAWAB AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.38, 3^RD CROSS MUNISWAMAPPA LAYOUT HIDAYATH NAGAR, K.G.HALLI BENGALURU-560 045.

¶25

…RESPONDENTS

¶26

(BY SRI. K.NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1)

¶27

THIS CRL.P. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.26/2019 AGAINST THE PETITIONER WHICH IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE XI A.C.M.M., MAYO HALL, BENGALURU FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 498-A R/W SECTION 34 OF IPC.

¶28

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶29

¶30

NC: 2025:KHC:41401 CRL.P No. 6570 of 2020

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN

¶33

ORAL ORDER

¶34

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have challenged the FIR registered in Crime No.26/2019 in the instant criminal petition. He further submits that, subsequent to the filing of the criminal petition, chargesheet has been filed against the accused. Accordingly, he prays that the present criminal petition may be dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty to challenge the chargesheet.

¶35

His submission is placed on record.

¶36

The criminal petition is hereby dismissed as

¶37

withdrawn reserving liberty to the petitioners to initiate appropriate proceedings challenging the chargesheet in accordance with law, if they are so advised.

¶38

Sd/(M.I.ARUN) JUDGE

¶39

PGG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4

Syed Shahabuddin v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Syed Shahabuddin v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R. D. Chaitra Vs Directorate of Enforcement

Smt Sabah Azeez Vs the State of Karnataka

Mr.Santosh Sidha Vs Ms.Rohini Iyengar

Shekar Havanje Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt. Tamashree Deb Vs Mrs. Saraswathi

Athikulla Sharif Vs State of Karnataka