Dismissed¶25

Mr Santhosh S v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC4 Mar 2025CRL.P/504/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; NC: 2025:KHC:9140; CRL.P No. 504 of 2025; decided 04.03.2025 by Justice S Vishwajith Shetty; regular bail petition of accused no.2 Santhosh.S dismissed as not pressed; petitioner in custody since 19.04.2024; Crime No.137/2024; S.C.No.1054/2024; Halasur Police Station; offences under IPC Sections 120B, 201, 302 r/w 34; filed under S.439 Cr.P.C. / S.483 BNSS; liberty to renew bail after eye witness examination; priority examination of alleged eye witnesses requested.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to renew his bail application after examination of the alleged eye witnesses is completed before the Trial Court; prosecution and Trial Court requested to examine the alleged eye witnesses on priority. ¶25

Mr Santhosh S Vs the State of Karnataka — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:9140 CRL.P No. 504 of 2025

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 504 OF 2025

¶5

BETWEEN:

¶6

MR SANTHOSH.S

¶7

SON OF SARAVAN V, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.393, 4^TH MAIN, B.D.A DOMMALURU, BENGALURU 560071

¶8

…PETITIONER

¶9

(BY SRI.RAJANNA B.C., ADVOCATE)

¶10

AND:

¶11

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH HALASUR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU 560008 REPTD. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU 560001

¶12

…RESPONDENT

¶13

Digitally signed by MARIGANGAIAH PREMAKUMARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

(BY SRI.VINAY MAHADEVAIAH., HCGP)

¶15

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CR.P.C. (FILED UNDER SECTION 483 BNSS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITONER / ACCUSED NO.2 ON REGULAR BAIL IN CRIME NO.137/2024, S.C.NO.1054/2024 OF HALASUR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES P/U/S 120 b, 201, 302 R/W SECTION 34 OF IPC, WHICH IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF HONBLE XIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYOHALL UNIT, BENGALURU (CCH-22).

¶16

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶17

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

¶18

¶19

NC: 2025:KHC:9140 CRL.P No. 504 of 2025

¶20

ORAL ORDER

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the

¶22

matter for some time submits that petitioner is in custody from 19.04.2024. The petition may be dismissed as not pressed at this stage, with liberty to the petitioner to renew his bail application after examination of the alleged

¶23

eye witnesses is completed before the Trial Court.

¶24

Said submission is placed on record.

¶25

Petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty

¶26

as prayed for.

¶27

Considering the period of incarceration of the petitioner, the prosecution as well as the Trial Court is requested to examine the alleged eye witnesses in the present case on priority before the Trial Court.

¶28

SD/-

¶29

(S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE

¶30

¶31

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 59

Mr Santhosh S v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr Santhosh S v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Indresh N Vs the State of Karnataka

Mr.Mohamed Abdullah Mohamed Aslan Vs the Superintendent of Customs

Sri Narasimhamurthy @ Sanni @ Urus Vs State of Karnataka

Nagaraja Naika K Vs State by

Naveen Vs State of Karnataka

Rahil Vs State by