Dismissed¶¶36

Madithati Anil Kumar Reddy v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC17 Jan 2025CRL.P/50/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court bail rejection; regular bail denied; CRL.P 50/2025; S.439 Cr.PC / S.483 BNSS; Cr.No.394/2024 Govindaraja Nagar PS; S.109 BNS 2023; knife stabbing; autorickshaw accident quarrel; grievous abdominal injury; investigation in progress; judicial custody since 12.11.2024; Sessions Court approach after charge sheet.

What did the court decide?

No enlargement on bail; the petitioner is at liberty to move the Sessions Court after filing of the charge sheet. ¶¶36

Madithati Anil Kumar Reddy Vs State of Karnataka — Bail and Remand | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2017 CRL.P No. 50 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 17^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 50 OF 2025 (439(Cr.PC) /

¶7

483(BNSS))

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

MADITHATI ANIL KUMAR REDDY AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, S/O MADITHATI NAGI REDDY, PRESENTLY AT NO.564, ITI LAYOUT,GOPALAN ARCHADE, R.R. NAGAR, BENGALURU. ALSO AT: NO. 1/95, REDDY VARI PALLI, MASAPET, CUDDAPAH, RAYACHOTI, ANDHRA PRADESH-516 270.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. RAGHAVENDRA C., ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

STATE OF KARNATAKA GOVINDARAJNAGAR POLICE STATION REPRESENTED BY S.P.P. HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, HIGH COURT BUILDING, AMBEDKAR BEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001.

¶15

…RESPONDENT

¶16

(BY SRI. RANGASWAMY R., HCGP)

¶17

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 CR.P.C (U/S 483 BNSS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN

¶18

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2017 CRL.P No. 50 of 2025

¶19

CONNECTION WITH CRIME NO.394/2024 REGISTERED BY THE GOVINDARAJANAGAR POLICE STATION, BANGALORE FOR THE OFFENCES UNDER SECTION 109 OF THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, PENDING ON THE FILE OF XXIV ADDL. CJM, BANGALORE.

¶20

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶21

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ

¶22

ORAL ORDER

¶23

This petition is preferred praying to enlarge the

¶24

petitioner on bail in Cr.No.394/2024 of Govindaraja Nagar Police Station registered for offence punishable under Section 109 of BNS, 2023.

¶25

Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader for

¶26

respondent/State and perused the material on record.

¶27

It is the case of prosecution that on 11.11.2024 at about 7.15 – 7.30 p.m., the victim had parked his autorickshaw in front of a bakery in 4^th cross, Subbanna Garden. The accused who was on a two wheeler hit the autorickshaw from behind. A verbal quarrel took place

¶28

¶29

NC: 2025:KHC:2017 CRL.P No. 50 of 2025

¶30

between the two. Accused took a knife and stabbed the victim on the abdomen, left hand and fisted him on his face and on seeing the public approaching, fled away.

¶31

Petitioner’s counsel would contend that the incident was not premeditated. As a result of a petty accident, a sudden quarrel took place and in the said quarrel, some injuries are caused. He contended that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 12.11.2024 and the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

¶32

Learned High Court Government Pleader has contended that the injured has sustained grievous injuries and investigation is under progress.

¶33

The material on record would reveal that the petitioner was in possession of a knife when the incident took place. It is true that the incident was a result of a quarrel, which ensued after a petty accident. However, the petitioner has stabbed on the abdomen of the injured with a knife. The said injury as per medical records is grievous in nature. Since investigation is still under

¶34

¶35

NC: 2025:KHC:2017 CRL.P No. 50 of 2025

¶36

progress, at this stage, this Court is of the view that this is not a fit case to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Petition is

¶37

dismissed.

¶38