Dismissed¶¶44

K Ganesh Babu v. Smt Kusuma Kumari

Karnataka HC21 Mar 2025CRL.A/428/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRL.A No. 428 of 2025, High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, decided 21.03.2025 (Justice H.P. Sandesh): criminal appeal under Section 340 r/w Section 379(2) of BNSS Act against order dated 23.01.2025 of 5th Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru in O.S.No.8729/2004 directing registration of Criminal Misc.C.No.684/2025 against appellant on I.A.No.26 under Section 379 r/w Section 215 of BNSS Act, 2023; appeal dismissed as withdrawn on counsel's memo at admission stage; no merits adjudicated, no precedents cited, no amounts involved.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the appeal; criminal appeal dismissed as withdrawn. ¶¶44

K Ganesh Babu Vs Smt Kusuma Kumari — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:11950 CRL.A No. 428 of 2025

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21^ST DAY OF MARCH, 2025

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

¶6

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.428 OF 2025

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

K. GANESH BABU, S/O LATE KRISHAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.26/1-1, CHAITHANYA, 2^ND CROSS, M.T.LAYOUT, BEHIND MES COLLEGE, 13^TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM, BANGALORE-560 053.

¶9

Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶10

ALSO AT: NO.23, GROUND FLOOR, MODEL LIC HOUSING COLONY, BASAVESHWANR NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 079.

¶11

…APPELLANT

¶12

(BY SRI. ANGAD KAMATH, ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

SMT. KUSUMA KUMARI, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, W/O LATE SRI. S.VEKATESHWARALU, REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER, SRI. S. SRAVAN CHITANYA, S/O LATE SRI. S.VENKATESHWARALU, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT NO.189/A, MLA COLONY ROAD, NO.12, BANJARA HILLS, HYDERABAD-500 034.

¶15

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:11950 CRL.A No. 428 of 2025

¶16

SRI. B.G. CHENNNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS.

¶17

SRI. HARSHA VARDHAN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS.

¶18

BOTH RESIDENT OF 17/2, OMKARNAGAR, GANKAL VILLAGE, KENGERI HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK.

¶19

DR. HAFEEZUR RAHMAN, AGED ABOUT 88 YEARS, S/O LATE A. ABDUL AZEEZ.

¶20

MR. SHAFEEQUR RAHMAN, AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, S/O LATE A. ABDUIL AZEEZ.

¶21

BOTH RESIDENTS OF NO.599, MINA, 2^ND MAIN, TEACHERS COLONY, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560 034.

¶22

MR. NAZEEBUR RAHMAN, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, S/O LATE A. ABDUL AZEEZ, R/AT AREHALLI VILLAGE, BELUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573 101.

¶23

SMT. KAMARUNNISA, AGED ABOUT 99 YEARS, D/O LATE A. ABDUL AZEEZ, W/O LATE ABDUL GANI.

¶24

SMT. FARHATH HAYATH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, D/O LATE A. ABDUL AZEEZ, W/O LATE C.R.MOHD HAYATH.

¶25

BOTH RESIDENTS OF AREHALLI VILLAGE BELUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573 101.

¶26

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:11950 CRL.A No. 428 of 2025

¶27

REPRESENTED BY THEIR GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, MR. NAJEEBUR RAHMAN, S/O LATE A. ABDUL AZEEZ, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/O AREHALLI VILLAGE, BELUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573 101.

¶28

SRI. SYED AFROZ, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, S/O LATE SYED GHOUSE, R/AT AREHALLI VILLAGE, BELUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573 101.

¶29

SRI. SYED SHERAZ, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, S/O LATE SYED GHOUSE.

¶30

SMT. SAIRA RAFATH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, D/O LATE SYED GHOUSE AND LATE SMT.RAHAMATHUNNISA.

¶31

BOTH RESIDENTS OF AREHALLI VILLAGE, BELUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573 101.

¶32

SMT. SHIVAMMA K., W/O LATE MR.GURUSIDDAPPA, AGED : MAJOR, R/AT BHAVIHAL VILLAGE, NARAGANAHALLI, DEVANAGERE-577 534.

¶33

…RESPONDENTS

¶34

(BY SMT. ANUSHA B. REDDY, ADVOCATE C/R1)

¶35

THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 340 R/W SECTION 379(2) OF BNSS ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 23.01.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED 5^TH ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU IN

¶36

4 - NC: 2025:KHC:11950 CRL.A No. 428 of 2025

¶37

O.S.NO.8729/2004 DIRECTING THE REGISTRATION OF A CRIMINAL MISC.C.NO.684/2025 AGAINST THE APPELLANT HEREIN ON THE APPLICATION I.A.NO.26 FILED UNDER SECTION 379 R/W SECTION 215 OF BNSS ACT, 2023.

¶38

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶39

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

¶40

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶41

The learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo

¶42

seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal.

¶43