Dismissed¶36

Sumanth Kumar R v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC24 Mar 2025CRL.P/3930/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; CRL.P No. 3930 of 2025; Justice Hemant Chandangoudar; order dated 24-03-2025; quashing petition under S.482 CrPC / S.528 BNSS; dismissal as withdrawn; liberty to file afresh upon filing of charge sheet; PCR No. 11127/2024; IV ACJM Bangalore; offences under IPC Ss.120(B), 381, 406, 408, 411, 414 r/w 34; IT Act Ss.43, 66, 72(A); petitioners Sumanth Kumar R and others incl. Truelearn Global LLP; respondent Freshlearn Global Events Private Limited; State of Karnataka by Bharati Nagara Police Station; advocate N. Sriram Reddy; HCGP Lakshman B.

What did the court decide?

Liberty reserved to the petitioners to file a petition afresh in the event charge sheet is filed. ¶36

Sumanth Kumar R Vs State of Karnataka — Cheating and Forgery | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:12366 CRL.P No. 3930 of 2025

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3930 OF 2025

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SUMANTH KUMAR R

¶9

S/O. R KUMARA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS R/AT. NO.42, 7^TH CROSS, LAKSHMI LAYOUT, MARATHAHALLI BANGALORE-560037.

¶10

ARUN. V S/O. R KUMARA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS

¶11

R/AT. NO.614, WHITEFIELD ROAD, CHIKKANANJAPPA LAYOUT, RAMAGONDANAHALLI BANGALORE NORTH

¶12

Digitally signed by B K MAHENDRAKUMAR Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶13

BANGALORE-560 037.

¶14

R. SUSHANTH KUMAR S/O. R KUMAR AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT. NO.42, 7^TH CROSS, LAKSHMI LAYOUT, MARATHAHALLI BANGALORE-560037.

¶15

RAKSHITA P

¶16

S/O. SUMANTH KUMAR R AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/AT. NO.42, 7^TH CROSS, LAKSHMI LAYOUT, MARATHAHALLI BANGALORE-560037.

¶17

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:12366 CRL.P No. 3930 of 2025

¶18

S. VANI W/O R KUMARA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT NO.42, 7^TH CROSS LAKSHMI LAYOUT, MARATHAHALLI BANGALORE-560 037.

¶19

TRUELEARN GLOBAL LLP A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP WITH REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.42, 7^TH CROSS LAKSHMI LAYOUT, MUNNEKOLAL MARTHALLI COLONY BANGALORE-560 037 REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY SMT. S. VANI.

¶20

…PETITIONERS

¶21

(BY SRI. N. SRIRAM REDDY, ADVOCATE)

¶22

AND:

¶23

STATE OF KARNATAKA BY BHARATI NAGARA POLICE STATION REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE-01.

¶24

FRESHLEARN GLOBAL EVENTS PRIVATE LIMITED A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY WITH REGISTERED ADDRESS AT NO.20, LAKE VIEW MANOR A.S. M ROADS, OPP. ULSOORU LAKE SIVEN CHETTY GARDENS BANGALORE-560 042 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SECRETARY MS. NOOR USSABAH.

¶25

…RESPONDENTS

¶26

(BY SRI. LAKSHMAN B., HCGP FOR R1)

¶27

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.P.C (U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT IN PCR.NO.11127/2024 FILED BY THE COMPLAINANT BEFORE AND PENDING ON THE

¶28

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:12366 CRL.P No. 3930 of 2025

¶29

FILE OF THE HON'BLE IV ACJM, AT BANGALORE, FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 120(B), 381, 406, 408, 411, 414 R/W 34 OF IPC, U/S 43, 66, 72(A) OF I.T ACT.

¶30

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶31

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

¶32

ORAL ORDER

¶33

The learned High Court Government Pleader accepts notice for the respondent No.1.

¶34

The learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter for sometime seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition reserving liberty to the petitioners to file a petition.

¶35

The submission is placed on record.

¶36

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty to the petitioners to file a petition afresh in the event charge sheet is filed.

¶37

Sd/(HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE

¶38

BKM

¶39

List No.: 3 Sl No.: 33

Sumanth Kumar R v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sumanth Kumar R v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mubarak @ Mubbu @ Thofik Noree Vs State of Karnataka

Venkateshalu K Vs State of Karnataka

Sri. Yogendra Mahara Vs State of Karnataka

Karthik Vs State of Karnataka by

Ramu Shetagar Vs the State

Laxman Parannavar Vs the State of Karnataka