Dismissed¶31

Senthil Kumar v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC15 Sept 2025CRL.P/2171/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru; CRL.P No. 2171 of 2023; J.M. Khazi, J.; decided 15.09.2025; S.482 Cr.PC (and BNSS S.528 noted) quashing petition against proceedings in C.C.No.57933/2018 before 29th ACMM, Mayo Hall, Bangalore (Marathahalli Police); dismissed for default/non-prosecution after non-compliance with office objections notwithstanding conditional order dated 11.06.2025; pending applications disposed; no merits decided, no case law relied upon.

What did the court decide?

The petitioners were unrepresented in both the forenoon and afternoon sessions and did not comply with the office objections despite the conditional order dated 11.06.2025; the court held that they appeared not interested in prosecuting the matter and accordingly dismissed the criminal petition for default. ¶31

Senthil Kumar Vs State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:36590 CRL.P No. 2171 of 2023

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2171 OF 2023

¶7

(482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS))

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SENTHIL KUMAR

¶10

S/O LATE VASUDEVAN, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,

¶11

RESIDING AT NO 3, VASU NILAYAM, 2ND MAIN, 1ST CROSS, ABBIAH REDDY LAYOUT, KAGADASPUR, BANGALORE

¶12

SRIMATHI

¶13

Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

W/O LATE VASUDEVAN, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO 3, VASU NILAYAM, 2ND MAIN, 1ST CROSS, ABBIAH REDDY LAYOUT, KAGADASPUR, BANGALORE

¶15

…PETITIONERS

¶16

(BY SRI. NAGARAJA N, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)

¶17

AND:

¶18

STATE OF KARNATAKA BY MARATHHALLI POLICE, REPRESENTED BY SPP, HIGH COURT, BENGALURU.

¶19

…RESPONDENT

¶20

(BY SMT.N.ANITHA GIRISH, HCGP)

¶21

¶22

NC: 2025:KHC:36590 CRL.P No. 2171 of 2023

¶23

HC-KAR

¶24

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.57933/2018 PENDING BEFORE 29TH ACMM MAYO HALL, BANGALORE.

¶25

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶26

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI

¶27

ORAL ORDER

¶28

No representation for petitioners.

¶29

No representation for petitioners even in the afternoon session.

¶30

Vide order dated 11.06.2025, a conditional order was passed by granting a week's time to comply with the office objections, failing which necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of the petition. Despite the same, the office objections are not complied with.

¶31