Dismissed¶23

Suman v. B v State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC18 Feb 2025CRL.A/2053/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail; withdrawal of appeal; memo by counsel; Section 14(A)(2) SC/ST (POA) Act 2015 appeal; Crime No.247/2023 Halasurugate Police Station Bengaluru; Sections 506, 341, 504, 307 IPC; Section 3(1)(r)(s) SC/ST (POA) Act; chargesheet filed during appeal; liberty to file fresh bail petition before Trial Court; appeal dismissed as withdrawn; High Court of Karnataka; single judge V. Srishananda; order dated 18-02-2025; Crl.Misc.No.9504/2023; LXX Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge (CCH-71).

What did the court decide?

In view of the memo filed by the learned counsel for the appellant, the criminal appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. ¶23

Suman v B Vs State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:7198 CRL.A No. 2053 of 2023

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 18^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶7

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2053 OF 2023

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SUMAN V.B. S/O VENKATESH MURTHY AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS NO.1016, 1^ST FLOOR, O.T.C. ROAD, NAGARTHPET NEAR DHARMARAYA SWAMY TEMPLE, NAGARTHPET, BANGALORE NORTH BANGALORE - 560 002

¶10

…APPELLANT

¶11

(BY SRI. BHARATH KUMAR VINDHYALA, ADVOCATE) AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

STATE OF KARNATAKA BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE HALASURUGATE POLICE STATION BENGALURU - 560 002 REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU - 560 001 2. MANIKANTA K (MANIKANDAN) S/O LATE KANAN R/AT NO.82/2, SADARA PRATAP ROAD NEAR MARIYAMMA TEMPLE, KUMARAPETE BUILDING IN DOWNWARD RIGHT SIDE OF RAM MEDICAL BENGALURU - 560 002 …RESPONDENTS

¶14

(BY SRI. CHANNAPPA ERAPPA, HCGP FOR R1)

¶15

NC: 2025:KHC:7198 CRL.A No. 2053 of 2023

¶16

¶17

THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 14(A)(2) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT, 2015 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE HONBLE LXX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-71) AT BENGALURU IN CRL.MISC.NO.9504/2023 DATED 12.10.2023 AND ENLARGE HIM ON BAIL IN CR.NO.247/2023, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE LXX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-71) AT BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 506, 341, 504, 307 OF IPC AND SECTION 3(1)(r)(s) OF SC AND ST (POA) ACT, REGISTERED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT POLICE STATION ON SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

¶18

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS , THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶19

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶20

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶21

A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the appellant, which reads as under:

¶22

"The appellant submits that subsequent to filing of this appeal the respondent No.1 has submitted that chargesheet, in view of the changed circumstances, the appellant prefers to file a fresh bail petition before the Hon'ble Trial Court and hence, the appellant may be permitted to withdraw the present appeal with a liberty to file a fresh Bail petition before this Hon'ble Court, in the interest of justice."

¶23

In view of the memo, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶24

Sd/(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

¶25

AV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10

Suman v. B v State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suman v. B v State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri K Subramanyam Vs State by

K H Ramakrishnaiah Vs State of Karnataka

Sri Nataraju H S Vs State by

Sri N Hanumantha Reddy, Vs M Papaiah

Raja @ J.C. Krishnaraju Vs State by Harohalli Police

Sri Pradeep Kumar Vs State of Karnataka