Dismissed¶32

Ashwath v. the State of Karnataka and Anr.

Karnataka HC12 Mar 2025CRL.P/200948/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC Kalaburagi Bench; CRL.P No. 200948 of 2024; S.482 Cr.P.C. quashing petition regarding CC No. 115/2018 (offences under Secs 323, 324, 504, 506 IPC; Crime No. 136/2017, Chittapur Police Station) pending before Civil Judge and JMFC Chittapur; petitioner Ashwath s/o Tukaram Rathod acquitted by Trial Court on 20.02.2025; withdrawal memo allowed; petition dismissed as withdrawn; single-judge order by Justice S Rachaih dated 12.03.2025.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to withdraw the petition; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. ¶32

Ashwath Vs the State of Karnataka and Anr. — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC-K:1600 CRL.P No. 200948 of 2024

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

¶4

KALABURAGI BENCH

¶5

DATED THIS THE 12^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 200948 OF 2024

¶9

(482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS))

¶10

BETWEEN:

¶11

ASHWATH S/O TUKARAM RATHOD, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE NOW LEGAL PRACTITIONER, R/AT STATION THANDA, CHITTAPUR-585211.

¶12

…PETITIONER

¶13

(BY SRI. B. C. JAKA, ADVOCATE)

¶14

AND:

¶15

Digitally signed by RENUKA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶16

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH CHITTAPUR POLICE STATION, DIST. KALABURAGI-585211, NOW REPRESENTED BY ADDL. SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH-585107.

¶17

MAHADEV S/O SOMLA RATHOD, AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/AT. STATION THANDA, CHITTAPUR-585211.

¶18

…RESPONDENTS

¶19

(BY SRI GOPAL KRISHNA YADAV, HCGP FOR R1 SRI SHIVASHARANA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

¶20

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYIHNG TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONER IN CC NO. 115/2018, PENDING ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC CHITTAPUR, FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/SEC. 323, 324, 504, 506 OF IPC, WHICH IS REGISTERED ON THE

¶21

2 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1600 CRL.P No. 200948 of 2024

¶22

BASIS OF CASE REGISTERED IN CRIME NO. 136/2017, BY THE CHITTAPUR POLICE AND AFTER INVESTIGATION FILED CHARGE SHEET AGAINST THE PETITIONER, TO SECURE THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND TO PREVENT ABUSE OF PROCESS OF THE COURT AND PASS SUCH OTHER ORDER OR ORDERS, WHICH THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO PASS, IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE.

¶23

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶24

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

¶25

ORAL ORDER

¶26

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH)

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo

¶28

seeking withdrawal of the petition. The averments of the said memo, which reads as under:

¶29

“The advocate for the petitioners submits that, in the case after trial the petitioners has been acquitted by the Trial Court on 20.02.2025, therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the petition.

¶30

Hence, the memo for withdrawal of the case”

¶31

On reading of the averments of the said memo, leave

¶32

is granted. Hence, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶33

Sd/(S RACHAIAH) JUDGE

¶34

TMP

¶35

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20 CT:PK

Ashwath v. the State of Karnataka and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashwath v. the State of Karnataka and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhimashi and Ors. Vs Muttappa

Kumar Vs the State of Karnataka and Anr.

Mohd. Allabaksha @ Saifaan Vs the State

Abbu Moulana @ Abubakar Vs the State of Karnataka

Muniram Renuka Prasad Vs State of Karnataka

Kamalakar Vs the State of Karnataka