Dismissed¶30

Mallikarjun v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC18 Jun 2025CRL.P/200670/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

HC Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench; CRL.P No.200670/2025 (NC: 2025:KHC-K:3176); Justice V Srishananda; decided 18-06-2025; quashing petition under S.482 Cr.P.C.(old)/S.528 BNSS; offence u/S.379 IPC; C.C. No.366/2022; Crime No.248/2021 Jewargi P.S.; cognizance dated 06.10.2022 challenged; petition dismissed as withdrawn on counsel's memo (not pressed) before admission; merits not decided; no precedent value on quashing.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners permitted to withdraw the criminal petition as not pressed; the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, with no relief on the merits of the quashing prayer. ¶30

Mallikarjun Vs the State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC-K:3176 CRL.P No. 200670 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

¶5

KALABURAGI BENCH

¶6

DATED THIS THE 18^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025

¶7

BEFORE

¶8

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶9

CRIMINAL PETITION No.200670 OF 2025

¶10

(482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS))

¶11

BETWEEN:

¶12

MALLIKARJUN S/O NINGAPPA LABAVI, AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: DRIVER, R/O DHORANAHALLI VILLAGE, TALUK SHAHAPUR, DIST. YADGIRI-585 201.

¶13

SUGURESH @ SUGURESHWAR S/O JAGADISH GULAGI, AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. BASAVESHWARA COLONY, NEAR COURT, SHAHAPUR, TALUK-SHAHAPUR, DIST. YADGIR-585 223.

¶14

Digitally signed by RENUKA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

(BY SRI. KIRAN KUMAR, ADV. FOR SRI. MAHANTESH PATIL, ADVOCATE)

¶16

…PETITIONERS

¶17

AND:

¶18

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ADDL. SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH-585 107, (THROUGH JEWARGI PS).

¶19

…RESPONDENT

¶20

(BY SRI. VEERANAGOUDA MALIPATIL, ADVOCATE)

¶21

2 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:3176 CRL.P No. 200670 of 2025

¶22

HC-KAR

¶23

THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482(OLD) 528 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE TAKING OF COGNIZANCE DATED 06.10.2022 AND ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C. NO.366/2022 (CRIME NO.248/2021, JEWARGI P.S.) AND FILING OF CHARGE SHEET AGAINST THE PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED NO.1 AND NO.2, FOR OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/S 379 OF IPC, PENDING ON FILE OF LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEWARGI, IN RESPECT OF PETITIONER.

¶24

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶25

ORAL ORDER

¶26

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA)

¶27

After addressing the arguments at length, learned

¶28

counsel for the petitioners files a memo, which reads as under:

¶29

“The counsel for the petitioners most humbly submits that, the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the case. Hence, they want to withdraw the above captioned petition. The petitioners may kindly be permitted to withdraw the petition as not pressed; hence same may be taken on record, in the interest of justice.”

¶30

Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as

¶31

withdrawn.

¶32

Sd/(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

¶33

kcm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 44 CT: AK

Mallikarjun v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mallikarjun v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ninganagouda Vs the State through Kembavi P.S.

Shivakumar and Anr. Vs the State of Karnataka and Anr.

Hassansab Vs B a Biradar

Rajshekhar S/O Kalyanraopatil Vs the State of Karnataka

Yankanna Yadav Vs the State of Karnataka

Sugureshwar Vs the State of Karnataka