Pandurang v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC5 Jun 2025CRL.P/200175/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court Kalaburagi Bench; Justice V Srishananda; CRL.P No. 200175 of 2025; Section 528 BNSS / 482 Cr.PC; quashing of criminal proceedings; cognizance order; Sections 471, 468, 420 IPC; C.C. No. 340/2016; Sedam; petition not pressed; withdrawal memo; dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to file fresh petition; no merits adjudicated.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file a fresh petition, as prayed for in the withdrawal memo ¶40-41

Pandurang Vs the State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC-K:2872 CRL.P No. 200175 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

¶5

KALABURAGI BENCH

¶6

DATED THIS THE 5^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025

¶7

BEFORE

¶8

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶9

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 200175 OF 2025

¶10

(482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS))

¶11

BETWEEN:

¶12

PANDURANG S/O NARASAPPA JAMADAR, AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: TEACHER, R/O. AGNAL HOSPITAL, NEAR CHINCHOLI CROSS, SEDAM, TQ.SEDAM, DIST. KALABURAGI-585 222,

¶13

NARASAMMA W/O PANDURANG JAMADAR, AGE:38 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O. AGNAL HOSPITAL, NEAR CHINCHOLI CROSS, SEDAM, TQ. SEDAM, DIST. KALABURAGI-585 222,

¶14

…PETITIONERS

¶15

(BY SRI. MAHANTESH H. DESAI, ADVOCATE)

¶16

Digitally signed by RENUKA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶17

AND:

¶18

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH SEDAM P.S., REPRESENTED BY ADDL. SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH-585 103.

¶19

NARSIM S/O BHIMANNA JAMADAR, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. H. NO. 95, BADEPUR, BEHIND HANUMAN TEMPLE, SEDAM ROAD, KALABURAGI 585 105.

¶20

…RESPONDENTS

¶21

(BY SRI JAMADAR SHAHABUDDIN, HCGP FOR R1 SRI MAHANTESH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

¶22

¶23

NC: 2025:KHC-K:2872 CRL.P No. 200175 of 2025

¶24

HC-KAR

¶25

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 528 OF BNSS PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PETITION AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF TAKING COGNIZANCE OF THE OFFENCES U/SEC. 471, 468, 420 OF IPC AND QUASHED THE ENTIRE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.340/2016 AGAINST THE PETITIONERS BY THE HON’BLE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND JMFC AT SEDAM.

¶26

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶27

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶28

ORAL ORDER

¶29

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA)

¶30

After addressing the arguments for considerable length

¶31

of time, learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo. The

¶32

said memo reads as under:

¶33

“Memo for withdrawal

¶34

May if your lordship.

¶35

That the counsel for the petitioner submits as under:

¶36

That the petitioner is not intend to press with the petition. Hence, the petitioner may kindly be permitted to withdraw the petition as not pressed. Kindly liberty to file a fresh petition. Hence, this memo.”

¶37

NC: 2025:KHC-K:2872 CRL.P No. 200175 of 2025

¶38

¶39

HC-KAR

¶40

Placing the aforesaid memo on record, the petition is

¶41

dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

¶42

Sd/(V SRISHANANDA)

¶43