Machendra v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC2 Jul 2025CRL.P/200121/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Kalaburagi Bench; CRL.P No. 200121 of 2024; V Srishananda, J.; decided 02-07-2025; quashing petition under S.482 Cr.P.C. (old)/S.528 BNSS Act (new) concerning FIR in Crime No.67/2020 of Santpur Police Station, Bidar, and charge sheet in C.C.No.557/2021 (S.18 Karnataka Essential Commodities (PDS) Public Control Order 1992; Karnataka Essential Commodities Ss.3 and 7) before Addl. C.J. (JD) and JMFC Aurad; withdrawn on maintainability memo; dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh petition. ¶¶31-32

Machendra Vs the State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC-K:3572 CRL.P No. 200121 of 2024

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

¶5

KALABURAGI BENCH

¶6

DATED THIS THE 02^ND DAY OF JULY, 2025

¶7

BEFORE

¶8

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶9

CRIMINAL PETITION No.200121 OF 2024

¶10

(482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS))

¶11

BETWEEN:

¶12

MACHENDAR S/O DHULAPPA JAMADAR, AGE:44 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. KASHAMPUR, TQ. AURAD, DIST. BIDAR-585226.

¶13

…PETITIONER

¶14

(BY SRI. AMEERAHAMAJA ABDULKADAR GUNNAPURA, ADVOCATE)

¶15

AND:

¶16

Digitally signed by RENUKA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶17

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH, SANTPUR POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY THE, ADDL. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI-585102.

¶18

RAVI SURYAWANSHI, FOOD SIRESTEDAR, TAHASIL OFFICE, AURAD-585226. DIST. BIDAR

¶19

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JAMADAR SHAHABUDDIN, HCGP FOR R1)

¶20

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S. 482 OF CR.P.C (OLD ) U/SEC. 528 OF BNSS ACT (NEW) PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PRESENT CRIMINAL PETITIONER AND ALSO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS AND

¶21

2 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:3572 CRL.P No. 200121 of 2024

¶22

HC-KAR

¶23

CHARGE SHEET REGISTERED FIR IN CRIME NO.67/2020 WAS REGISTERED AT SANTPUR POLICE STATION, BIDAR DISTRICT AND CHARGE SHEET FILED BEFORE THE HON’BLE COURT AGAINST PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/SEC. 18 OF KARNATAKA ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES (PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM) PUBLIC CONTROL ORDER 1992 AND KARNATAKA ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES U/SEC. 3 AND 7 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THE SAID CASE TRIALED AT ADDL. C.J. (JD) AND JMFC AURAD OF BIDAR DIST. ( C.C.NO.557/2021)

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶25

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶26

ORAL ORDER

¶27

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA)

¶28

Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo,

¶29

which reads as under:

¶30

“In the above case the filed petition is not maintainable. Hence I want to withdraw the petition. It is prayed before Hon’ble Court kindly permit to withdraw the petition with liberty to file fresh petition in the interest of justice.”

¶31

Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as

¶32

withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

¶33

Sd/(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

¶34

kcm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27 CT:PK

Machendra v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Machendra v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Soheb Khan and Anr. Vs Deputy Director and Ors.

Kamagond and Ors. Vs the State of Karnataka and Anr.

Manappa and Anr. Vs Deputy Director and Ors.

Dr Jairaj S/O Late Bhasker and Ors. Vs the State of Karnataka and Anr.

Bushra Fatima Vs the State of Karnataka

Gullapalli Ganga Bhavani Vs M/S Dattareya Traders and Anr.