Dismissed¶¶31

Dilip @ Dilip Kumar v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC9 Dec 2025CRL.P/15969/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC (NC: 2025:KHC:52100), CRL.P No. 15969 of 2025, Justice Mohammad Nawaz, 09.12.2025 — petition dismissed as NOT MAINTAINABLE (duplicate/identical earlier petition already preferred). Quashing of arrest dated 16.11.2023 in Cr.No.182/2023, Doddabelavangala PS; Spl.C.61/2024 before II Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural; S. 482 Cr.P.C.; S. 528 BNSS; Sections 302, 143, 149 IPC; Section 3(2)(5) SC/ST (POA) Act; release from judicial custody refused; no merits decided.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner had already preferred a petition seeking an identical prayer; his assertion in this petition that no similar application had been filed before this Court or any other Court was incorrect. ¶¶30

Dilip @ Dilip Kumar Vs State of Karnataka — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:52100 CRL.P No. 15969 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 9^TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 15969 OF 2025

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

DILIP @ DILIP KUMAR S/O LATE CHANNAKESHAVA AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS R/A KUNTANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561203

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. RAKSHITH R..,ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

STATE OF KARNATAKA

¶14

BY DODDABELAVANAGALA PS

¶15

Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶16

REP BY LEARNED SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE-560001

¶17

CHIEF SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL PRISON, PARAPPANNA AGRAHARA BANGALORE-560068

¶18

…RESPONDENTS

¶19

(BY SRI. RAHUL RAI. K., HCGP)

¶20

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ARREST OF PETITIONER DATED 16.11.2023 IN CR.NO.182/2023 OF DODDABELAVANGALA PS PENDING ON THE FILE OF LD II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 302, 143, 149 OF IPC AND SECTION 3 (2)(5) OF SC AND ST POA ACT IN SPL.C.61/2024 AND

¶21

¶22

NC: 2025:KHC:52100 CRL.P No. 15969 of 2025

¶23

HC-KAR

¶24

CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT RESPONDENT.NO.2 TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER FROM JUDICIAL CUSTODY.

¶25

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶26

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ

¶27

ORAL ORDER

¶28

Learned counsel for petitioner is not present.

¶29

The office has raised an objection regarding maintainability of the petition, as the petitioner has already preferred a petition seeking identical prayer.

¶30

In this petition, it is stated that the petitioner has not filed any similar application before this Court or any other Court, which is incorrect.

¶31

Petition is dismissed as not maintainable .

¶32

Sd/(MOHAMMAD NAWAZ) JUDGE

¶33

LDC

¶34

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17

Dilip @ Dilip Kumar v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dilip @ Dilip Kumar v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Hemavathi Vs State by Jalahalli Police Station

Kiran Kumar Cb Vs State of Karnataka by Psi

Mr. Nagaraj C R Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Suraj Singh Vs State of Karnataka

Vasvi K K Vs State by Panchanahalli P S

Sri. Dr. S. B. Vikram Vs Sri. B. Venkatesh