Dismissed¶¶32

M/S Samkit Impex Importer and Exporter v. M/S Adhishakti Transformer

Karnataka HC21 Nov 2025CRL.A/159/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; CRL.A No. 159 of 2022; Justice G Basavaraja; decided 21-11-2025. Appeal under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. against acquittal dated 05.10.2021 in C.C.No.30612/2015 (Section 138 N.I. Act case) by XIII Addl. C.M.M., Bangalore. Appellant: M/s Samkit Impex Importer and Exporter (counsel Srikanth B.). Respondents: M/s Adhishakti Transformer and Veerabhadrayya B Dandavathimath (served and unrepresented). Matter amicably settled during pendency; memo for withdrawal filed; appeal dismissed as withdrawn. No precedent discussed; no monetary amount awarded.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to the appellant to withdraw the appeal; appeal dismissed as withdrawn following amicable settlement. ¶¶32

M/S Samkit Impex Importer and Exporter Vs M/S Adhishakti… — Cheque Dishonour | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC:48139 CRL.A No. 159 of 2022

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 21^ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA

¶7

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 159 OF 2022

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

M/S SAMKIT IMPEX IMPORTER AND EXPORTER #81 & 82, 13^TH CROSS KARIMSAB LAYOUT SRIGANDA NAGAR NEAR DODDANNA INDL. ESTATE BENGALURU- 560091 REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI. RASHMIKANT MEHATA.

¶10

…APPELLANT

¶11

(BY SRI. SRIKANTH B., ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

M/S ADHISHAKTI TRANSFORMER Digitally signed OLD NO. D-7, THE GADAG CO-OF by DHARMALINGAM INDL. ESTATE HUBLI ROD, GADAG -582101 Location: HIGH COURT OF REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR AND KARNATAKA AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY SRI. PRABHU.

¶14

MR. VEERABHADRAYYA B DANDAVATHIMATH PROPRIETOR OF M/S ADHISHAKTI TRANSFORMER OLD NO. D-7, THE GADAG CO-OF INDL. ESTATE, HUBLI ROAD, GADAG- 582101.

¶15

…RESPONDENTS

¶16

(R1 & R2 ARE SERVED & UNREPRESENTED)

¶17

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:48139 CRL.A No. 159 of 2022

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S.378(4) CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANT/S PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 05.10.2021 PASSED IN C.C.NO.30612/2015 BY THE XIII ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU AND PUNISH THE RESPONDENTS AS PER LAW U/S 138 OF N.I. ACT AND ETC.

¶20

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶21

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA

¶22

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶23

The learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo for withdrawal.

¶24

The memo of withdrawal reads as under:

¶25

"The above said appellant respectfully submits as hereunder:-

¶26

That, the present appeal was filed challenging the acquittal order dated 05.10.2021 passed in C.C.NO.30612/2015, by the XIII Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore, It is further submitted that, during the pendance of the above said appeal, the accused/respondent were approached the complainant/appellant for

¶27

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:48139 CRL.A No. 159 of 2022

¶28

HC-KAR

¶29

amicable settlement and by intervention of friends and well wished both the parties, the matter is settled, therefore, it is prayed that, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to dismiss the above said appeal as withdrawn"

¶30