Dismissed¶31

Mr Kaisar Pasha v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC22 Sept 2025CRL.A/1561/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court at Bengaluru; CRL.A No. 1561 of 2025 (U/S 14(A)(2) SC/ST (POA) Act); appellant Kaisar Pasha (advocate Sri. Lokesha T.); respondents State of Karnataka (Nelamangala Rural P.S.) and Smt. Yellamma (HCGP Smt. Waheeda M.M. for R1); impugned order dated 24.06.2025 in Crl.Misc.No.1066/2025 by Addl. District and Sessions Judge, FTSC-II, Bengaluru Rural District; bail sought in Cr.No.100/2025, Nelamangala Rural P.S. (Spl.CC.No.360/2025); offences: 70(1) BNS, 67(b) IT Act, 4/6/8/10/12 POCSO Act 2012, 3(2)(v) SC/ST (POA) Act 1989; withdrawal memo dated 22.09.2025; appeal dismissed as withdrawn; coram S Rachaiah, J.; decided 22.09.2025.

What did the court decide?

The memo dated 22.09.2025 filed by learned counsel for the appellant seeking permission to withdraw the appeal was accepted and taken on record. ¶29

Mr Kaisar Pasha Vs the State of Karnataka — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:38036 CRL.A No. 1561 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 22^ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1561 OF 2025 (U/S14(A)(2))

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

MR KAISAR PASHA S/O ALLABAKSH AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS RESIDING AT NEAR BGM KALYANA MANTAPA T BEGUR, KASABA HOBLI NELAMANGALA TALUK-562 123 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT (NOW IN JUDICIAL CUSTODY)

¶10

…APPELLANT

¶11

Digitally signed by SREEDHARAN BANGALORE SUSHMA LAKSHMI Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶12

(BY SRI. LOKESHA T., ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA NELAMANGALA RURAL P.S. NELAMANGALA REP BY SPP HIGH COURT COMPLEX BENGALURU – 01

¶15

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:38036 CRL.A No. 1561 of 2025

¶16

HC-KAR

¶17

2. SMT YELLAMMA

¶18

WIFE OF GOVINDA RAJU AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS REP MINOR GUARDIAN (DAUGHTER) R/AT THONACHINAKUPPE VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI NELAMANGALA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT – 562 123

¶19

…RESPONDENTS

¶20

(BY SMT. WAHEEDA M.M. HCGP FOR R1)

¶21

THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 14(A)(2) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANT/S PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 24.06.2025 IN CRL.MISC.NO.1066/2025 PASSED BY THE ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, FTSC-II, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, AT BENGALURU, VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND TO ENLARGE THE APPELLANT ON BAIL IN CR.NO.100/2025 REGISTERED BY NELAMANGALA RURAL P.S., (SPL.CC.NO.360/2025) FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 70(1) OF BNS, U/S 67(B) OF I.T ACT, U/S 4,6,8,10,12 OF POCSO ACT, 2012, U/S 3(2)(V) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT, 1989, PENDING ON THE FILE OF ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, FTSC-II, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, AT BENGALURU.

¶22

¶23

NC: 2025:KHC:38036 CRL.A No. 1561 of 2025

¶24

HC-KAR

¶25

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

¶26

JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶27

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

¶28

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶29

Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 22.09.2025, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal. The memo is accepted and taken on record.

¶30