Dismissed¶27

Tulasi v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC24 Jun 2025CRL.P/13700/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for default of a Section 482 CrPC quashing petition (CRL.P No. 13700 of 2023, High Court of Karnataka, 24.06.2025, J.M. Khazi, J.) seeking quashing of Spl.C.C.No.420/2019 arising out of Cr.No.1/2019 of Mahadevapura Police Station, Bengaluru, alleging offences under IPC Sections 504, 506, 306 r/w 34, 37, 109 and SC/ST Act Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(v-a); petitioner absent/no representation; office objections uncomplied with despite conditional order dated 13.06.2025; pending applications disposed of; no merits adjudicated.

What did the court decide?

None; pending application(s), if any, stood disposed of as no separate order was required. ¶27

Tulasi Vs the State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:22209 CRL.P No. 13700 of 2023

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13700 OF 2023

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

TULASI W/O KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, RESIDING AT NEAR MADONA SCHOOL, 9TH CROSS, UDAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 016.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. MANJUNATHA B.V, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶13

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MAHADEVAPURA POLICE STATION, BENGALURU, REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, COMPLEX, BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶14

SMT. DEVI, W/O SUBRAMANI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 64, VIVEKANANDA STREET, UDAYANAGAR, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA - 560 016.

¶15

…RESPONDENTS

¶16

(BY SRI. M.K. PATIL, HCGP)

¶17

¶18

NC: 2025:KHC:22209 CRL.P No. 13700 of 2023

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO ALLOW AND QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN SPL.C.C.NO.420/2019 (IS ARISING OUT OF CR.NO.1/2019) OF MAHADEVAPURA P.S., FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S 504, 506, 306 R/W 34, 37 AND 109 OF IPC AND SEC.3(1,r,s) 3(2)(Va) OF SC/ST ACT PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HONBEL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BENGALURU.

¶21

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶22

CORAM: HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

There is no representation for the petitioner.

¶25

On 13.06.2025, a conditional order was passed

¶26

indicating that, if the office objections are not complied with, necessary orders will be passed.

¶27

Despite the same, office objections have not been complied with. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for default.

¶28

¶29

NC: 2025:KHC:22209 CRL.P No. 13700 of 2023

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31