Smt Farida Begum v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC23 Oct 2025CRL.P/13147/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; CRL.P No. 13147 of 2025 (438(Cr.PC)/482(BNSS)); NC: 2025:KHC:41890; decided 23-10-2025 by Justice Shivashankar Amaranannavar. Anticipatory bail petition in Cr.No.77/2025, Barke P.S., Mangalore, under Sections 316(2), 318(2) r/w 3(5) BNS; earlier rejection by I Addl. District & Sessions Judge, D.K., Mangaluru on 12.08.2025 in Crl.Misc.No.679/2025; petitioner arrested during pendency; withdrawal memo filed; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition. Keywords: anticipatory bail, withdrawal, infructuous petition, arrest during pendency, BNS 316(2), BNS 318(2), BNS 3(5), Cr.P.C. 438, BNSS 482.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file a fresh petition, as prayed in the withdrawal memo. ¶27-28

Smt Farida Begum Vs State of Karnataka — Anticipatory Bail | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:41890 CRL.P No. 13147 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23^RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL PETITION No. 13147 OF 2025 (438(Cr.PC) / 482(BNSS))

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SMT. FARIDA BEGAM D/O ABDUL LATHIF

¶9

AGED 24 YEARS R/AT DOOR No.5-314, MURA KUPPEPADAVU POST, MUTHOOR KOLAVOOR, MANGALORE TALUK DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI MAHAMMAD ANWAR, ADVOCATE)

¶12

Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

AND:

¶14

STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY BARKE POLICE STATION DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT REP. BY SPP PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE – 01.

¶15

…RESPONDENT

¶16

(BY SRI CHANNAPPA ERAPPA, HCGP)

¶17

THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 Cr.P.C (U/S 482 BNSS) PRAYING TO RELEASE HIM ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF ARREST IN CR.No.77/2025 PERTAINING TO BARKE P.S., FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 316(2),318(2) R/W 3(5) OF BNS, PENDING ON THE FILE OF JMFC (VI COURT) MANGALORE THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, D.K., MANGALURU HAS REJECTED THE BAIL PETITION ON 12.08.2025 IN CRL.MISC.No.679/2025.

¶18

¶19

NC: 2025:KHC:41890 CRL.P No. 13147 of 2025

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶22

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioner files memo for

¶25

withdrawal. The memo reads thus:

¶26

“ It is submitted that the petitioner filed above petition seeking anticipatory bail in Cr.No.77/2025 pertaining to Barke P.S. Mangalore. Since the respondent police arrested the petitioner during pendency of the present petition. Hence the petition becomes infructuous. Therefore, it is most respectfully prayed before this Hon’ble Court may pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the present petition and liberty to be granted to file fresh petition in the interest of justice and equity.”

¶27

In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as

¶28

withdrawn, with liberty as prayed.

¶29

Sd/(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE

¶30

DKB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25 Ct.sm

Smt Farida Begum v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Farida Begum v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Liyaqath Ali @ Holaluliyaqath Ali Vs State of Karnataka

Vinod Gowda D @ Vinod Vs State of Karnataka

Vinod Kumar G Vs State of Karnataka

Sri Sendil Kumar @ Sendhil Vs State of Karnataka

Thangamma Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. Sangameshwara Vs State by