Dismissed¶39

Yogesh Kumar v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC12 Aug 2025CRL.P/12480/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC CRL.P No. 12480 of 2023, decided 12.08.2025 by J.M. Khazi, J. Keywords: quashing petition dismissed for default; no representation; office objections not complied; conditional order 31.07.2025; S.482 CrPC; S.528 BNSS notation; accused Yogesh Kumar, Kamalamma, Jayashree, Smitha; complainant/respondent Mamatha; State of Karnataka (SHO, Ramanagara Women Police Station); alleged offences Ss.498A, 323, 324, 504, 506 r/w 34 IPC and Ss.3-4 Dowry Prohibition Act; C.C.No.957/2023; Crime No.108/2022; Principal Civil Judge and JMFC Ramanagara; petitioner counsel B.H. Bhagavan absent; HCGP N. Anitha Girish.

What did the court decide?

None; petition dismissed for default. ¶39

Yogesh Kumar Vs the State of Karnataka — Dowry and Cruelty | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:31315 CRL.P No. 12480 of 2023

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 12^TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 12480 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS))

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

YOGESH KUMAR S/O GANESH

¶10

AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

¶11

SMT KAMALAMMA W/O GANESH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS

¶12

JAYASHREE W/O KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

¶13

Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

SMITHA D/O KRISHNA

¶15

AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS

¶16

ALL ARE R/AT NO.3007, BALAGERI OPP CANARA BANK ATM RAMANAGARA TOWN-562159

¶17

…PETITIONERS

¶18

(BY SRI. B.H.BHAGAVAN, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)

¶19

¶20

NC: 2025:KHC:31315 CRL.P No. 12480 of 2023

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

AND:

¶23

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

¶24

THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER RAMANAGARA WOMEN POLICE STATION RAMANAGARA

¶25

REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING COMPLEX BENGALURU-560001

¶26

MAMATHA

¶27

W/O YOGESH KUMAR AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/A BALAGERI, RAMANAGARA TOWN-562159

¶28

…RESPONDENTS

¶29

(BY SMT.N.ANITHA GIRISH, HCGP)

¶30

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.957/2023 (IS ARISING OUT OF CR.NO.108/2022) OF RAMANAGARA WOMEN POLICE STATION, FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S 498A, 323, 324, 504, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC AND SEC. 3 AND 4 OF D.P. ACT, PENDING ON THE FILE OF HONBLE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT RAMANAGARA.

¶31

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶32

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI

¶33

ORAL ORDER

¶34

No representation for petitioners.

¶35

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:31315 CRL.P No. 12480 of 2023

¶36

HC-KAR

¶37

No representation for petitioners even in the second round.

¶38

Vide order dated 31.07.2025, a conditional order was passed by granting a week's time to comply with the office objections. Despite the same, the office objections are not complied with.

¶39

It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed for default.

¶40

In view of the disposal of petition, pending application/s, if any, stands disposed off, as no separate order is required.

¶41

Sd/(J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE

¶42

ASN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15

Yogesh Kumar v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yogesh Kumar v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Basavaraj R Uppar Vs the Lokayukta

Mr. Venkatesh T K Vs State of Karnataka

Mr Raswan Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. Jothi Mahimyanathan Vs M/S Swabhimani Souharda Credit Co. Operative Ltd.

Jayashree G.V. Vs State by Karnataka

Sri Mukkatira Neeth Ayyappa Vs the State by