Syed Mohammed Irshad v. State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court (single bench, Sachin Shankar Magadum, J.), CRL.P No. 12189 of 2025, decided 25.09.2025: maintainability of a Section 482 CrPC inherent-jurisdiction petition where an efficacious statutory remedy of appeal is available against an order passed under Section 452 CrPC; petition dismissed as not maintainable with liberty to appeal; time exclusion under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963; Section 528 BNSS; Syed Mohammed Irshad v. State of Karnataka (Ullal P.S.), Mangaluru; monetary claim of Rs.8,37,500 with 18% interest not adjudicated.
What did the court decide?
None substantively; petition dismissed as not maintainable with liberty reserved to the petitioner to avail the statutory remedy of appeal, and a direction that if an appeal is filed within three weeks the time spent in these proceedings shall stand excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963.