Dismissed¶40

Fakkirappa S/O. Yankappa Shellikeri, v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC17 Mar 2025CRL.P/103659/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC Dharwad Bench, CRL.P No. 103659 of 2024 (NC: 2025:KHC-D:4812), V. Srishananda J., order dated 17-03-2025: regular-bail petition of accused 1, 2, 4 and 5 of Naragund P.S. Crime No.73/2024 (ss.143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 326, 307, 302, 341, 504, 506 r/w 149 IPC; trial S.C.No.67/2024, Prl. District & Sessions Judge, Gadag) dismissed AS WITHDRAWN on counsel's memo, with liberty to file a fresh bail petition after completion of material witnesses' evidence; filed u/S.439 CrPC / S.483 BNSS; State objections by HCGP Girija S. Hiremath; no bail merits decided, no precedents discussed.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition (for regular bail) after completion of the evidence of the material witnesses, as prayed for in their memo. ¶40

Fakkirappa S/O. Yankappa Shellikeri, Vs the State of… — Bail and Remand | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC-D:4812 CRL.P No. 103659 of 2024

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

¶4

DATED THIS THE 17^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.103659 OF 2024 (439(CR.PC)/483(BNSS))

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

FAKKIRAPPA

¶10

S/O. YANKAPPA SHELLIKERI,

¶11

AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. LAKAMAPUR, TQ. NARGUND, DIST. GADAG-582206.

¶12

SHIVANAND

¶13

S/O. YANKAPPA SHELLIKERI,

¶14

Digitally signed by V N V N BADIGER BADIGER Date: 2025.03.18 11:15:23 +0530

¶15

AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. LAKAMAPUR, TQ. NARGUND, DIST. GADAG-582206.

¶16

YALLAPPA

¶17

S/O. FAKKIRAPPA SHELLIKERI,

¶18

AGE: 23 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. LAKAMAPUR, TQ. NARGUND, DIST. GADAG-582206.

¶19

4. SHRIKANTA

¶20

S/O. FAKKIRAPPA SHELLIKERI, AGE: 23 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. LAKAMAPUR, TQ. NARGUND, DIST. GADAG-582206.

¶21

2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4812 CRL.P No. 103659 of 2024

¶22

…PETITIONERS

¶23

(BY SRI K.L. PATIL, ADVOCATE)

¶24

AND:

¶25

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH NARAGUND P.S., R/BY. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD-580011.

¶26

…RESPONDENT

¶27

(BY SMT.GIRIJA S. HIREMATH, HCGP)

¶28

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S. 439 OF CR.P.C. (SECTION 483 OF BNSS), SEEKING TO GRANT REGULAR BAIL TO THE PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1, 2, 4 AND 5 FOR NARAGUND P.S. CRIME NO.73/2024 REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/SECTIONS 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 326, 307, 302, 341, 504, 506 R/W. SECTION 149 OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE S.C.NO.67/2024 PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, GADAG.

¶29

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶30

¶31

NC: 2025:KHC-D:4812 CRL.P No. 103659 of 2024

¶32

ORAL ORDER

¶33

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)

¶34

Learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent-

¶35

State has filed statement of objections.

¶36

The same is taken on record.

¶37

After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo. Memo reads as under:

¶38

The Advocate for the Petitioners submits as under: That, the Petitioner want to apply for the regular bail after completion of the evidence of the material witnesses. Hence, the Petitioners want to withdraw the above petition with liberty to file fresh petition after completion of the evidence of the material witnesses.

¶39

Hence, this Hon’ble court may be pleased to dismiss the Petition with liberty to file fresh petition after completion evidence of material witnesses in the ends of justice.

¶40

Placing the memo on record, petition stands dismissed

¶41

as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

¶42

SD/(V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

¶43

AC/CT:PA

Fakkirappa S/O. Yankappa Shellikeri, v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Fakkirappa S/O. Yankappa Shellikeri, v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hullesh S/O Mahadevappa Kojji Vs the State of Karnataka

Ashok S/O Babu Kamble, Vs the State of Karnataka, by State Public Prosecutor

Farhat Aara Shaikh W/O. Sameer Shaikh Vs the State of Karnataka

Shri Bahubali Bhimarayappa Payyappannavar Vs Shri Gulshan Vishnu Gulabani

Shri Bahubali Bhimarayappa Payyappannavar, Vs Shri Gulshan Vishnu Gulabani

S. Vijaya Kumar S/O Narasimhulu Vs B. Veranna S/O. Late Sharanppa