Dismissed¶59

Shri Kanteppa Ningappa Malangi v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC24 Jun 2025CRL.P/102112/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRL.P No. 102112 of 2025; Kanteppa Ningappa Malangi v. State of Karnataka (Raibag P.S.); bail rejection under S.483 BNSS / S.439 Cr.P.C.; BNS Sections 103(1), 238, 61, 140 r/w 3(5); S.C. No.5041/2025, VII Addl. District & Sessions Court, Chikkodi; circumstantial evidence and last-seen witness; post-mortem facial bone fractures (injury nos. 6 & 7); parity with bailed Accused No.2 denied; petitioner in judicial custody since arrest; High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench; Justice Venkatesh Naik T; decided 24 June 2025.

What did the court decide?

On perusal of the charge-sheet papers and the post-mortem report, there is a prima facie allegation against the petitioner (Accused No.4) of assaulting the deceased with hands on his face, showing his involvement in the alleged offences. ¶52

Shri Kanteppa Ningappa Malangi Vs the State… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC-D:7990 CRL.P No. 102112 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

¶5

DATED THIS THE 24^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 102112 OF 2025

¶9

(439 OF Cr.PC/483 OF BNSS)

¶10

BETWEEN:

¶11

SHRI KANTEPPA NINGAPPA MALANGI, AGE: 24 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE, R/O. SHIRAHATTI K.D, TQ. HUKKERI, DIST. BELAGAVI-591305.

¶12

…PETITIONER

¶13

(BY SHRI SHARAD M. PATIL, ADVOCATE)

¶14

AND:

¶15

Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench

¶16

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH RAIBAG P.S, REPRESENTED BY ADDITIONAL STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH.

¶17

…RESPONDENT

¶18

(BY SHRI ABHISHEK MALIPATIL, HCGP)

¶19

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S.439 OF CR.P.C. (U/S.483 OF BNSS, 2023), SEEKING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER /ACCUSED NO. 4 ON BAIL AND MAY BE ORDERED TO BE RELEASED ON BAIL IN RAIBAG PS CRIME NO.368/2024 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S.103, 238, 61, 140, 3(5) OF BNS NOW IN S.C NO.5041/2025 PENDING BEFORE VII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BELAGAVI, SITTING AT CHIKKODI AND ETC.

¶20

THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶21

¶22

NC: 2025:KHC-D:7990 CRL.P No. 102112 of 2025

¶23

HC-KAR

¶24

ORAL ORDER

¶25

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T)

¶26

Heard Sri. Sharad M.Patil., learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. Abhishek Malipatil., learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent – State.

¶27

This petition is filed by the petitioner/Accused No.4 under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (“BNSS” for short) (Section 439 of Cr.P.C) to grant bail in S.C.No.5041/2025, pending on the file of learned VII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Belagavi sitting at Chikkodi.

¶28

Brief facts of the case of the prosecution are as under:

¶29

On 01.11.2024 at 7:00 p.m, accused Nos.1 to 4 made criminal conspiracy in order to commit murder of one Beerappa. Thus, they took him to a party in order to consume alcohol. Accordingly, on 02.12.2024 at 6:00 p.m., accused No.1 – Neelappa Karavalli kidnapped the

¶30

3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:7990 CRL.P No. 102112 of 2025

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

deceased Beerappa in a CD-Deluxe motorcycle bearing registration No.KA.23/EH-9498 and took him to Raibag, made him to consume alcohol, where accused No.3 – Mahantesh Pujari, the petitioner herein, accused No.4 – Kanteppa Ninappa Malangi (petitioner herein) were present. They had dinner at Sahara Daba, took him to the land bearing Sy.No.79/2 of one Satyappa Kallappa Kariholi, where they quarrelled with the deceased. Accused No.1 assaulted the deceased with a stone on his face and head, accused No.3 – Mahantesh Pujari and accused No.4 Kanteppa Malangi also assaulted with hands on the face of the deceased. Thereafter, in order to screening the offence, they shifted the body from the scene of offence to railway track near the railway under bridge coming under territory of Nagaral village near Byakod-Raibag road, which leads to registration of case and to conduct investigation.

¶33

After investigation, the Investigating Officer has filed the charge-sheet against the accused persons for the

¶34

4 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:7990 CRL.P No. 102112 of 2025

¶35

HC-KAR

¶36

offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 238, 61, 140 read with Section 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (“BNS” for short). During the course of investigation, the petitioner, accused Nos.1 to 3 were arrested and in turn, remanded to the judicial custody. Since then, the petitioner is in judicial custody.

¶37

Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that, the petitioner is an innocent and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution and there are no criminal antecedents. The petitioner is law abiding citizen and an agriculturist by profession and he is the sole bread earner of the family. He is ready to abide by the conditions to be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail.

¶38

Per contra learned High Court Government Pleader contended that there is prima-facie material against the petitioner as he has involved in the heinous offences punishable under sections 103(1), 238, 61, 140

¶39

5 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:7990 CRL.P No. 102112 of 2025

¶40

HC-KAR

¶41

read with Section 3(5) of BNS, which are punishable with death or imprisonment for life. If he is released on bail there is likelihood of he flee away from justice and there is also chance of tampering the witnesses and hampering the trial. Hence, he prayed for dismissal of the petition.

¶42

On perusal of the material available on record including the charge sheet, it appears that, on 02.12.2024 accused Nos.1, 3 and 4 took the deceased in order to commit crime on the premise that the deceased had illicit relationship with accused No.2. The records reveals that accused No.2 has been enlarged on bail by the Trial Court. From perusal of the statement of witnesses, it appears that the case is based on circumstantial evidence and as per the last seen witness, it reveals that prior to death of deceased, accused Nos.1, 3 and 4 and deceased had consumed alcohol together and had dinner at Sahara Daba. Thereafter, on the following day, the deceased was missing from the scene of offence and accused Nos.1, 3 and 4 were missing from their village. Subsequently, on

¶43

¶44

NC: 2025:KHC-D:7990 CRL.P No. 102112 of 2025

¶45

HC-KAR

¶46

03.12.2024, the dead body of deceased was found on the

¶47

railway track near Railway Bridge at Nagaral village. As per postmortem examination report, the doctor has noticed injury Nos.6 and 7, which is as follows:

¶48

“6. Face swollen with evidence of fracture of multiple facial bones (nasal, maxila, mandible).

¶49

7. Bleeding from nose and ear noted.”

¶50

As per injury No.6 and 7 i.e., face swollen with

¶51

evidence of fracture of multiple facial bones (Nasal, maxilla, mandible) and bleeding from nose and ear noted.

¶52

As per the charge sheet papers the allegations made against accused No.4 – petitioner herein that he assaulted the deceased with hands on his face, as per P.M. Report, face of deceased was swollen. It shows that, there is prima-facie allegation against the petitioner/Accused No.4 and his involvement in the alleged offences.

¶53

7 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:7990 CRL.P No. 102112 of 2025

¶54

HC-KAR

¶55

The allegations made against accused No.2 with

¶56

that of accused No.3 and 4 are on the different footing. Therefore, parity cannot be extended to accused No.4. Thus, the petitioner is not entitled for bail. Accordingly,

¶57

this Court proceed to pass the following:

¶58

ORDER

¶59

The criminal petition is hereby rejected.

¶60

NOTE:- The observation made in the petition is only for the purpose of disposal of this petition.

¶61

Sd/(VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE

¶62

AM /CT-AN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37