Dismissed¶31

Shri Ameet S/O Avinash Mane v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC7 Jul 2025CRL.P/101902/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail petition dismissed as withdrawn on counsel's memo; liberty to file fresh petition; petitioners (Accused 12 & 13) may seek similar relief after examination of material witnesses; S.439 Cr.P.C. / S.483 BNSS 2023; Nippani Town P.S. Crime No.61/2024; BNS Ss.189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 61(2)(A), 103, 238 r/w 190, 49, 3(5); S.C. No.5002/2025, VII Addl. Dist. & Sessions Judge, Belagavi at Chikkodi; withdrawal memo; Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench; Justice Venkatesh Naik T; NC: 2025:KHC-D:8435; decided 07-07-2025.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to file a fresh petition, the Court noting that the petitioners may seek similar relief soon after examination of the material witnesses. ¶31

Shri Ameet S/O Avinash Mane Vs the State of Karnataka — Bail and Remand | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC-D:8435 CRL.P No. 101902 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

¶5

DATED THIS THE 7^TH DAY OF JULY, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 101902 OF 2025 (439 OF Cr.PC/483 OF BNSS)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SHRI AMEET S/O. AVINASH MANE, AGE: 24 YEARS, OCCUPATION: MECHANIC, R/O. RENUKA MANDIR, SIDDARTH COLONY, NIPPANI, DISTRICT-BELAGAVI, PIN-591237.

¶11

SHRI SHANTANU S/O/ ASHOK CHOUGALE. AGE: 21 YEARS. OCCUPATION: PRIVATE WORK. R/O/ BUDDHA NAGAR, NIPPANI, DISTRICT-BELAGAVI, PIN-591237.

¶12

…PETITIONERS

¶13

(BY SRI. S. M. MUCHHANDI, ADVOCATE)

¶14

AND:

¶15

Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench

¶16

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THE POLICE INSPECTOR, NIPPANI TOWN POLICE STATION, DISTRICT BELAGAVI, PIN-591237, REPRESENTED BY ITS STAE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT: DHARWAD BENCH, PIN-580011.

¶17

…RESPONDENT (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S.439 OF CR.P.C. (U/S.483 OF BNSS, 2023) SEEKING TO ALLOWED THE PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.12 & 13 AND ENLARGED ON REGULAR BAIL BY IMPOSING REASONABLE CONDITIONS IN NIPPANI TOWN P.S CRIME NO.61/2024 U/S.189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 61(2)(A), 103, 238 R/W. 190, 49 AND 3(5) OF BNS PENDING TRIAL ON THE FILE OF VII ADDL DIST AND SESSIONS JUDGE BELAGAVI SITTING AT CHIKKODI IN S.C. NO.5002/2025, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

¶18

(BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP)

¶19

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶20

¶21

NC: 2025:KHC-D:8435 CRL.P No. 101902 of 2025

¶22

HC-KAR

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T)

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioners and learned HCGP

¶26

for respondent-State are present.

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo.

¶28

Memo reads as under:

¶29

“It is humbly submitted that these petitioners request this Hon’ble Court to give them permission to withdraw the case with liberty to file fresh petition to meet the ends of justice and equity.”

¶30

Memo is placed on record.

¶31

In view of the memo, petitioner is dismissed as withdrawn. However, liberty is granted as sought for.

¶32

Note: It is made clear that the petitioners may seek similar relief soon after examination of material witnesses.

¶33

Sd/(VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE

¶34

HMB /CT-/AN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24

Shri Ameet S/O Avinash Mane v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Ameet S/O Avinash Mane v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri. N. Channabasavana Gouda S/O Doddanagowda Vs the State of Karnataka

Surendra Gundu Ugare Vs the State of Karnataka

Pavan Kumar Nandavaram S/O Srinivas Vs the State of Karnataka

Abhishek Prakash Ankad Vs State of Karnataka Represented by

Sri. Chandan Patil R S/O Ratnakar Patil Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt. Bagyamma N Chalageri W/O Nagaraj Chalageri Vs the CBI (Central Bureau of Investigation)