Allowed

Sharukh Sypulla Khan v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC24 Nov 2025CRL.P/101579/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought quashing of criminal proceedings arising from a domestic dispute complaint after the parties settled the matter. The complainant's affidavit confirmed the compromise. The court recorded the compromise and allowed the petition.

What did the court decide?

Entire proceedings in Crime No.19/2020 of Bagalkot Women P.S. were quashed in terms of the settlement; pending I.As disposed.

Sharukh Sypulla Khan Vs the State of Karnataka — Dowry and Cruelty | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC-D:16249 CRL.P No. 101579 of 2024

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶5

AT DHARWAD

¶6

DATED THIS THE 24^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025

¶7

BEFORE

¶8

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH

¶9

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.101579 OF 2024 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS))

¶10

BETWEEN:

¶11

SHARUKH SYPULLA KHAN, AGE. 29 YEARS, OCC. DRIVER, R/O. BYAHATTI PLOT, ANANDA NAGAR, TQ. HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD, PIN. 5800024.

¶12

Digitally signed by SAMREEN AYUB DESHNUR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

JAHARA SYPULLA KHAN, AGE. 57 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. BYAHATTI PLOT, ANANDA NAGAR, TQ. HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD, PIN. 5800024.

¶14

MUBINA SADIK HUBBALLI, AGE. 31 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. BANKAPUR, NOW AT ANANDA NAGAR, TQ. HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD, PIN. 5800024.

¶15

&PETITIONERS

¶16

(BY SRI. R.S. HATTIKATAGI, ADVOCATE)

¶17

¶18

NC: 2025:KHC-D:16249 CRL.P No. 101579 of 2024

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

AND:

¶21

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY BAGALKOT WOMEN POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH-580011.

¶22

SHAHIN S/O. SHARUKH KHAN, AGE. 25 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE R/O. BYAHATTI PLOT, ANANDA NAGAR, N/A. NAVANAGAR, VANBE COLONY, BAGALKOTE, PIN.587103.

¶23

&RESPONDENTS

¶24

(BY SRI. PRAVEENA Y.DEVAREDDIYAVARA, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. SADYOJAT R.BALIGATTIMATH, ADV. FOR R2 (VK FILED IN COURT))

¶25

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482

¶26

OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO, ALLOW THE PETITION AND QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C. NO.176/2021 (ARISING OUR OF BAGALKOT WOMEN P.S. CR.NO.19/2020) AT ANNEXURE-C PENDING BEFORE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BAGALKOT FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS

¶27

498(A), 323, 504, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC AND ETC.,.

¶28

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶29

¶30

NC: 2025:KHC-D:16249 CRL.P No. 101579 of 2024

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

ORAL ORDER

¶33

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH)

¶34

The learned counsel for the petitioners has filed

¶35

application under Section 320(2) r/w. Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 359 r/w. Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 along with the affidavits of petitioners and respondent No.2-complainant stating that, the matter has been settled between the parties.

¶36

The averments of the affidavit of respondent

¶37

No.2-complainant accompanying the application are as follows:

¶38

<1. I am the Respondent No.2 in the above petition and I know the facts and circumstances of the case hence I am competent to swear this affidavit. Hence I am swearing this Affidavit.

¶39

2. The contents of the Compromise petition are explained in Kannada and I have understood the same and they are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and also contents of the accompanying Affidavit, are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.=

¶40

4 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:16249 CRL.P No. 101579 of 2024

¶41

HC-KAR

¶42

Having considered the averments made in the

¶43

affidavits accompanying the application, it is appropriate to record the compromise as prayed for.

¶44

Accordingly, I proceed to pass the following:

¶45

ORDER .

¶46

i) The petition is allowed in terms of the settlement.

¶47

ii) The entire proceedings in Crime No.19/2020 of respondent No.1/Police are hereby

¶48

quashed .

¶49

iii) In view of the disposal of the petition, pending I.As, if any, are disposed off.

¶50

Sd/(S.RACHAIAH) JUDGE

¶51

PJ/CT: UMD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 55

Sharukh Sypulla Khan v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sharukh Sypulla Khan v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Puneet S/O Malleshappa Tuppad Vs the State of Karnataka

Abhilasha Alias Adithi D/O Basavaraj Abbigeri Vs the State of Karnataka by Its

Pradeep Nagappa Shetty Vs State of Karnataka by

Rahul S/O Sudhkar Revankar Vs Uttam S/O Anandu Naik

/S Shriram Transport Finance Company Limited Vs Smt. Ratna W/O v Prabhakar

Girish S/O Rudrayya Ajjayyanamath, Vs Murthujasab S/O Yamanoorsab