Dismissed¶27

Chandrashekar Alias Chandru v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC1 Apr 2025CRL.P/101338/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Dharwad Bench (NC: 2025:KHC-D:5777), CRL.P No. 101338 of 2025, decided 01-04-2025 by Justice V. Srishananda. Bail petition under S.439 CrPC / S.483 BNSS by Chandrashekar @ Chandru (Accused No.7) in Old Hubballi P.S. Crime No.110/2022 / S.C.No.5038/2023 involving offences under Sections 109, 114, 143, 147, 148, 120(B), 341, 302 r/w 149 IPC investigated by CID Police. Petition dismissed as withdrawn on counsel's memo; liberty granted to file a fresh petition. Keywords: withdrawal, memo, bail, additional chargesheet, CID Police, State of Karnataka.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh petition. ¶27

Chandrashekar Alias Chandru Vs the State of Karnataka — Bail and Remand | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC-D:5777 CRL.P No. 101338 of 2025

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

¶4

DATED THIS THE 1^ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.101338 OF 2025 (439(CR.PC)/483(BNSS))

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

CHANDRASHEKAR @ CHANDRU S/O. MADIVALAPPA MUDALINGANAVAR,, AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. RAYANAL VILLAGE, HOSAMANI ONI, HUBBALLI.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI IRANAGOUDA K. KABBUR, ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by V V N N BADIGER BADIGER Date:2025.04.02 11:21:40 +0530

¶14

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY CID POLICE, H AND B WING, CID HEAD QUARTERS, BENGALURU AND OLD HUBBALLI P.S., R/BY. ITS HIGH COURT ADDITIONAL STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, BENCH AT DHARWAD-580010.

¶15

…RESPONDENT

¶16

(BY SMT.GIRIJA S.HIREMATH, HCGP)

¶17

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CR.P.C. (UNDER SECTION 483 OF BNSS), SEEKING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.7 ON BAIL IN OLD HUBBALLI P.S. CRIME NO.110/2022 (S.C.NO.5038/2023 PENDING ON THE FILE OF I ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DHARWAD SITTING AT HUBBALLI) FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 109, 114, 143, 147, 148, 120(B), 341, 302 R/W. SECTION 149 OF IPC.

¶18

¶19

NC: 2025:KHC-D:5777 CRL.P No. 101338 of 2025

¶20

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶21

ORAL ORDER

¶22

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo. Memo

¶24

reads as under:

¶25

“Herein the counsel for Petitioner submits that, the petitioner is not intending to proceed with the petition as he needs to submit additional documents and additional chargesheet filed by the I.O. Therefore the petitioner intends to withdraw the petition with a liberty to file fresh petition.”

¶26

Placing the memo on record, petition stands dismissed

¶27

as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

¶28

SD/(V.SRISHANANDA)

¶29

JUDGE

¶30

AC CT:PA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 15

Chandrashekar Alias Chandru v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandrashekar Alias Chandru v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajashekhar Rajoor S/O Siddappa Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt. Sushilamma W/O Halanagouda Vs Shri Sannappa S/O Fakkirappa Lamani

Vinayak Alias Kiran S/O Chandrashekar Vs the State of Karnataka

Sunilkumar Alias Binas S/O Bennipaul Dasari Vs State of Karnataka

Shri. Harish Shridhar Kulkarni Vs the State of Karnataka

Manjunath S/O Gurusiddhappa Konnur Vs the State of Karnataka