Dismissed¶34

Aravind S/O Rupla Naik v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC21 Jul 2025CRL.P/100482/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Quashing petition dismissed as withdrawn on party settlement; S.482 Cr.P.C. / S.528 BNSS, 2023; offences under Sections 143, 147, 148, 504, 506, 149 IPC; C.C.No.379/2021 (Harapanahalli P.S. No.91/2020); Civil Judge and JMFC Harapanahalli; petitioner Aravind s/o Rupla Naik (Accused No.3); respondents State of Karnataka (Harapanahalli Police Station) and Goorya Naik s/o Jeetya Naik; counsel Prakash Badiger for petitioner, Smt. Kirtilata R. Patil HCGP for respondents; High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench; Justice Venkatesh Naik T; dated 21-07-2025.

What did the court decide?

In view of the memo and supporting submission, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. ¶34

Aravind S/O Rupla Naik Vs State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC-D:9029 CRL.P No. 100482 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

¶5

DATED THIS THE 21^ST DAY OF JULY, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.100482 OF 2025 (482 OF Cr.PC/528 OF BNSS)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

ARAVIND S/O. RUPLA NAIK, AGE: 24 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O. CHANNAHALLI TANDA, HARAPANAHALLI TALUK, BALLARI DISTRICT-573122.

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SHRI PRAKASH BADIGER, ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

STATE OF KARNATAKA, HARAPANAHALLI POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD-580011.

¶15

Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench

¶16

GOORYA NAIK S/O. JEETYA NAIK, AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. CHANNAHALLI TANDA, HARAPANAHALLI TALUK, BALLARI DISTRICT-573122.

¶17

…RESPONDENTS

¶18

(BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP)

¶19

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. (U/S. 528 OF BNSS, 2023) SEEKING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT, FIR AND CHARGE SHEET ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C. HARAPANAHALLI IN C.C.NO.379/2021 (HARAPANAHALLI P.S.NO.91/2020) AS AGAINST THE ACCUSED NO.3/PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCE UNDER SECTIONS 143, 147, 148, 504, 506 AND 149 OF IPC ABOVE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

¶20

¶21

NC: 2025:KHC-D:9029 CRL.P No. 100482 of 2025

¶22

HC-KAR

¶23

THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶24

ORAL ORDER

¶25

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T)

¶26

Shri Prakash Badiger., learned counsel for the petitioner is present and has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The contents of withdrawal memo read as under:

¶27

“The Advocate for the petitioner respectfully submits and states as follows:

¶28

The petitioner accused No.3 filed the present petition seeking quash the complaint, FIR and Charge Sheet on the file of Civil Judge and JMFC, Harapanahalli in C.C. No.379/2021 (Harapanahalli PS No.91/2020) as against the accused No.3/petitioner for the offence u/Sec.143, 147, 148, 504, 506 and 149 of IPC.

¶29

Now, the matter is settled between the parties before the trial court. Hence the petitioner withdrawing the present petition. Hence, this Hon’ble court may dismiss the present petition as withdrawn.”

¶30

¶31

NC: 2025:KHC-D:9029 CRL.P No. 100482 of 2025

¶32

HC-KAR

¶33

In view of the memo and supporting submission, the

¶34

petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶35

Sd/(VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE

¶36