Dismissed¶25

Shrinidhi S/O Venkatesh v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC12 Mar 2025CRL.P/100317/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Dharwad Bench; Justice V. Srishananda; 12-03-2025; CRL.P No. 100317 of 2025 (439(CR.PC)/483(BNSS)); petitioner Shrinidhi; respondents: State of Karnataka (Munirabad P.S.) and Gangamma; bail under S. 439 Cr.P.C. / S. 483 BNSS 2023 in Spl. S.C. (POCSO) No. 70/2024, Crime No. 200/2024, Koppal; IPC 137(2), 64(1), 351(2), 351(3), 352; POCSO Act 2012 S. 4; SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(1)(w), 3(2)(v); petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh after victim evidence; advocates: B.C. Jnanayya Swami (petitioner), Girija S. Hiremath HCGP (R1); R2 notice served; neutral citation NC: 2025:KHC-D:4729.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to withdraw the petition and file a fresh petition after completion of victim evidence. ¶25

Shrinidhi S/O Venkatesh Vs the State of… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC-D:4729 CRL.P No. 100317 of 2025

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

¶4

DATED THIS THE 12^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.100317 OF 2025 (439(CR.PC)/483(BNSS))

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SHRINIDHI S/O. VENKATESH AGE: 23 YEARS, OCC. LABOURER, R/O. HOLEMUDLAPUR VILLAGE, TQ. AND DIST. KOPPAL-582114.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI B.C.JNANAYYA SWAMI, ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA (THROUGH MUNIRABAD P.S) REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENCH AT DHARWAD.

¶14

Digitally
signed by
V N
V N BADIGER
BADIGER Date:
2025.03.19
10:34:38
+0530

¶15

GANGAMMA W/O. PAKKIRAPPA, AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O. HOLEMUDLAPUR VILLAGE, TQ. AND DIST. KOPPAL-582114.

¶16

…RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.GIRIJA S. HIREMATH, HCGP FOR R1; R2-NOTICE SERVED)

¶17

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/SEC. 439 OF CR.P.C. (U/SEC. 483 OF BNSS, 2023) SEEKING TO ALLOW THIS PETITION AND ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL I SPL. S.C. (POCSO) NO. 70/2024 PENDING ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE FTSC-I AT KOPPAL, IN CONNECTION WITH CR.NO. 200/2024, REGISTERED BY MUNIRABAD POLICE STATION, FOR THE OFFENCES 137(2), 64(1), 351(2), 351(3), 352 OF IPC, AND SEC. 4 OF POCSO ACT 2012. THE SCHEDULED CASTES AND THE SCHEDULED TRIBES (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) AMENDMENT BILL, 2015 U/SEC. 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) 3(1)(w), 3(2)(v), PENDING TRIAL OF THE CASE.

¶18

¶19

NC: 2025:KHC-D:4729 CRL.P No. 100317 of 2025

¶20

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶21

ORAL ORDER

¶22

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)

¶23

After arguing the matter for sometime, learned

¶24

counsel for the petitioner files a memo. Memo reads as under:

¶25

“The petitioner in the above case is going to withdraw the petition with liberty to file petition after completion of victim evidence. Hence, this memo.”

¶26

Placing the memo on record, revision petition is

¶27

dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

¶28

SD/(V.SRISHANANDA)

¶29

JUDGE

¶30

HMB CT:PA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 11

Shrinidhi S/O Venkatesh v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shrinidhi S/O Venkatesh v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandranayak S/O Malanayak Patil Vs the State of Karnataka

Ningusa S/O Ramachandrasa Habib Vs the State of Karnataka

Yallappa S/O Borappa Kapatugol Vs the State of Karnataka

Basappa S/O Shivappa Hangal Vs the State of Karanataka by

Smt Rantavva Hanamantagouda Patil Vs State of Karnataka

Smt Rajama W/O Basirsab Sankanuru Vs the State of Karnataka