Dismissed¶¶41

Smt Sujana W/O Shashikanth Khannur v. the State

Karnataka HC20 Jun 2025CRL.P/100092/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC (Dharwad Bench), CRL.P No.100092/2025, decided 20-06-2025 by Venkatesh Naik T, J. Petition under S.482 Cr.P.C./S.528 BNSS by 10 accused (Crime No.85/2024, Harapanahalli PS; IPC Ss.354(B), 506, 504, 143, 147, 149, 323, 354, 114) to quash proceedings before Prl. Civil Judge and JMFC, Harapanahalli; dismissed as withdrawn on petitioners' counsel's memo; liberty granted; no merits decided; no cases cited.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty as sought for granted to the petitioners. ¶¶41

Smt Sujana W/O Shashikanth Khannur Vs the State — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC-D:7865 CRL.P No. 100092 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

¶5

DATED THIS THE 20^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.100092 OF 2025 (482 OF Cr.PC/528 OF BNSS)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SMT. SUJANA W/O. SHASHIKANTH KHANNUR, AGE: 57 YHEARS, OCC: HOUSE MAKER, R/O. H. NO.65, NEAR SHAKTI TEMPLE, UDYANAGAR, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580030.

¶11

SHASHIKANTH S/O. GULAPPA KHANNUR, AGE: 59 YHEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. H. NO.65, NEAR SHAKTI TEMPLE, UDYANAGAR, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580030.

¶12

NINGAPPA S/O. SIDDAPPA JUMMANAVAR, AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. HAIDAR NAGAR, TQ. MUNDARAGI, DIST. VIJAYANAGAR-583201.

¶13

Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench

¶14

SMT. MANJULA D/O. SIDDAPPA JUMMANAVAR, AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE MAKER, R/O. HAIDAR NAGAR, TQ. MUNDARAGI, DIST. VIJAYANAGAR-583201.

¶15

SIDDAPPA S/O. DEVAPPA JUMMANAVAR, AGE: 63 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. HAIDAR NAGAR, TQ. MUNDARAGI, DIST. VIJAYANAGAR-583201.

¶16

SMT. SHANKRAMMA W/O. SIDDAPPA JUMMANAVAR, AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. HAIDAR NAGAR, TQ. MUNDARAGI, DIST. VIJAYANAGAR-583201.

¶17

CHANNAPPA S/O. YAMANAPPA KURIGAR, AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,

¶18

2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:7865 CRL.P No. 100092 of 2025

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

R/O. HAIDAR NAGAR, TQ. MUNDARAGI, DIST. VIJAYANAGAR-583201.

¶21

MALLAPPA S/O. BHARAMAPPA JUMMANAVAR, AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. HAIDAR NAGAR, TQ. MUNDARAGI, DIST. VIJAYANAGAR-583201.

¶22

BEERAPPA S/O. PAKIRAPPA PAKKIRAPPA, AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. SHIRANAHALLI VILLAGE, R/O. HAIDAR NAGAR, TQ. MUNDARAGI, DIST. VIJAYANAGAR-583201.

¶23

SMT. DRAKSHAYANI W/O. RAMKRISHNA MAGALAD, AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC: POLICE CONSTABLE, R/O. KANAHALLI VILLAGE, TQ. HARAPANAHALLI, DIST. VIJAYANAGAR-583201, NOW AT POLICE QUARTERS ADUGODI, BENGALURU.

¶24

…PETITIONERS

¶25

(BY SHRI SANJAY CHANAL, ADVOCATE)

¶26

AND:

¶27

THE STATE, HARAPANAHALLI P. S, REPRESENTED BYH S.P.P, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT: DHARWAD.

¶28

SMT. RAJESWARI W/O. HANUMANTHA, AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O. KANAHALLI VILLAGE, TQ. HARAPANAHALLI, DIST. VIJAYANAGAR-583201.

¶29

…RESPONDENTS

¶30

(BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1; R2-SMT. RAJESHWARI W/O. HANAMANTHA-PARTY IN PERSON)

¶31

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. (528 OF BNSS), SEEKING TO QUASH CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN SO FAR PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 10 ARE CONCERN IN CRIME NO.85/2024 IN HARAPANAHALLI P.S. PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARAPANAHALLI FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S.354(B), 506, 504, 143, 147, 149, 323, 354 AND 114 OF IPC, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

¶32

THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERSTHIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶33

¶34

NC: 2025:KHC-D:7865 CRL.P No. 100092 of 2025

¶35

HC-KAR

¶36

ORAL ORDER

¶37

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T)

¶38

Learned counsel for the petitioners, learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent No.1/State and learned counsel for respondent No.2 are present.

¶39

Learned counsel for the petitioners filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition.

¶40

In view of the memo and supporting submission, the

¶41

petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, liberty as

¶42

sought for is granted to the petitioners.

¶43

Sd/(VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE

¶44

AM /CT-AN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 62

Smt Sujana W/O Shashikanth Khannur v. the State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Sujana W/O Shashikanth Khannur v. the State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shivappa S/O Channaveerappa Goni Vs State of Karnataka

Shoukat Ilahi Awati Vs State of Karnataka

Bastu S/O Santan Lobo Vs State of Karnataka

Sri. Mohammed Rasool Kushtagi Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt. Najarin W/O. Mehamood Reshmi Vs State of Karnataka

Shri. Siddappa S/O. Shivayogappa Kittalli, Vs the State of Karnataka