Dismissed¶34

Khalsa Pharmaceuticals v. Novo Nordisk India Private Limited

Karnataka HC19 Nov 2025COMAP/54/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court commercial appeal dismissed as infructuous; interim-injunction order (Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 r/w Section 151 CPC) in Com.O.S.No.1845/2022 left untested because the underlying suit was disposed of; Khalsa Pharmaceuticals v. Novo Nordisk India Pvt. Ltd.; decided 19-11-2025; no merits decided, no quantum.

What did the court decide?

In view of the submission that the commercial suit itself stands disposed of, the appeal challenging the interlocutory order in Com.O.S.No.1845/2022 is dismissed as having become infructuous. ¶34

Khalsa Pharmaceuticals Vs Novo Nordisk India Private… — Company and Corporate | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

NC: 2025:KHC:47601-DB COMAP No.54/2024

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN

¶7

AND

¶8

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL

¶9

COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.54/2024

¶10

BETWEEN:

¶11

Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: High Court Of Karnataka

¶12

KHALSA PHARMACEUTICALS A SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS PLACE OF BUSINESS AT D -1/6, NIRALA NAGAR, LUCKNOW UTTAR PRADESH 226020 REP. BY ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR Mr. VEENA SACHDEVA.

¶13

(BY SMT. M.C. AMRUTHA VARSHINI, ADV.,)

¶14

…APPELLANT

¶15

AND:

¶16

NOVO NORDISK INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT PLOT NO.32, 47-50, EPIP AREA WHITEFILED, BANGALORE KARNAKTAKA 560066 REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MR. NITESH BAKSHI.

¶17

MR. ABHISHEK ANAND AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS RESIDING PRESENTLY AT 352C, EKTA VIHAR

¶18

¶19

NC: 2025:KHC:47601-DB COMAP No.54/2024

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

ELDECO UDYAN, 1 BANGLA BAZAAR LUCKNOW, UTTAR PRADESH 201026.

¶22

…RESPONDENTS

¶23

(BY SRI. PRASANTH V.G. ADV., FOR R1 R2 SERVED)

¶24

THIS COMAP/COMMERCIAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 13(1-A) OF THE COMMERCIAL COURTS, COMMERCIAL DIVISION AND COMMERCIAL APPELLATE DIVISION OF HIGH COURTS ACT, 2015 R/W ORDER XLIII RULE 1(R) OF THE CPC, 1908, PRAYING TO CALL FOR LOWER COURT RECORDS IN COM.O.S.NO.1845/2022, FILED BEFORE THE LD. LXXXV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-86). ALLOW THE PRESENT APPEAL. CONSEQUENTLY, SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED DECEMBER 12, 2023 PASSED BY THE LD. LXXXV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-86) ON I.A.NO.1 IN COM.O.S.NO.1845/2022 WHEREBY THE LEARNED COMMERCIAL COURT HAS ALLOWED I.A.NO.1 FILED BY RESPONDENT NO.1 UNDER ORDER 39 RULES 1 AND 2 R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC, 1908 & ETC.

¶25

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶26

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL

¶27

¶28

NC: 2025:KHC:47601-DB COMAP No.54/2024

¶29

HC-KAR

¶30

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶31

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL)

¶32

It is submitted that this appeal is filed challenging the order passed on interlocutory application filed by respondent No.1/plaintiff in Com.O.S.No.1845/2022. It is further submitted that the commercial suit itself is disposed of.

¶33

In view of the said submission, this appeal is dismissed

¶34

as having become infructuous.

¶35

Sd/-

¶36

(ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE

¶37

Sd/(VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE

¶38

ABK