Allowed¶42

Sri. Imtiyaz Ahamad S/O Rehmansab Tattimani v. Sri. Naseeruddin S/O Jalaluddin Inamdar

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 – Section 11(6) – Appointment of Arbitrator

Karnataka HC18 Jul 2025CMP/100004/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996; appointment of arbitrator; Clause 9 arbitration clause; joint development agreement dated 07.08.2019; notice dated 20/22.07.2022; respondent declined arbitrator nomination; consent/mutual submission of counsel; Sri. H. R. Deshpande Retd. District Judge appointed sole arbitrator; all contentions kept open; High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench; M.G.S. Kamal J.; CMP No. 100004 of 2025; NC: 2025:KHC-D:8926; decided 18 July 2025.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of Sri. H. R. Deshpande, Retd. Dist. Judge, as Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the parties. ¶42

Sri. Imtiyaz Ahamad S/O Rehmansab Tattimani Vs Sri… — Arbitration | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC-D:8926 CMP No. 100004 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 18^TH DAY OF JULY 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL

¶7

CIVIL MISC PETITION NO.100004 OF 2025

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI. IMTIYAZ AHAMAD S/O. REHMANSAB TATTIMANI, AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND BUSINESS, R/O: GOLDEN TOWN LAYOUT, KERIMATTIHALLI ROAD, HAVERI, TQ AND DIST: HAVERI – 581 110.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. SHRIHARS A. NEELOPANT, ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by SAROJA HANGARAKI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad

¶14

SRI. NASEERUDDIN S/O. JALALUDDIN INAMDAR, AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: RETIRED EMPLOYEE, R/O: T.G.ROAD, NEAR KALLABHAVI, HANGAL, TQ: HANGAL, DIST: HAVERI – 581 104. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. J. S. SHEETY, ADVOCATE)

¶15

THIS CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11(6) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 PRAYING TO APPOINT AN ARBITRATOR AS CONTEMPLATED UNDER CLAUSE NO.9 OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 07.08.2019 (ANNEXURE B) FOR RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES BETWEEN THE PARTIES. PASS ANY OTHER ORDER OR ORDERS AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT AND PROPER

¶16

¶17

NC: 2025:KHC-D:8926 CMP No. 100004 of 2025

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.,

¶20

THIS CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶21

ORAL ORDER

¶22

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL)

¶23

This petition is filed by the petitioner seeking

¶24

appointment of an Arbitrator as contemplated under Clause 9 of the Agreement dated 07.08.2019 produced at Annexure-B, stated to have been entered into between the petitioner and respondent for the purpose of joint development of immovable property.

¶25

It is contended that respondent being the owner of such an immovable property, being desirous of developing the same into a residential layout had entered into the aforesaid agreement with the petitioner.

¶26

A dispute arose between the petitioner and respondent in performance of the terms of the agreement.

¶27

¶28

NC: 2025:KHC-D:8926 CMP No. 100004 of 2025

¶29

HC-KAR

¶30

Clause 9 of the Agreement dated 07.08.2019 is

¶31

The petitioner apparently caused issue of a notice dated 20/22.07.2022 calling upon the respondent

¶32

herein to accept or nominate the Arbitrator as

¶33

contemplated under clause 9 of the Agreement for resolution of the dispute.

¶34

It is alleged that a reply to the same was issued by the respondent declining to accept the nomination of Arbitrator as indicated by the petitioner. Hence, the petition.

¶35

Learned counsel for the respondent fairly submits that the petition may be allowed.

¶36

Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondent mutually submit that Sri. H. R. Deshpande, Retd. Dist. Judge, may be appointed as an Arbitrator.

¶37

¶38

NC: 2025:KHC-D:8926 CMP No. 100004 of 2025

¶39

HC-KAR

¶40

Mutual submission made by learned counsel for

¶41

the parties is taken on record.

¶42

Accordingly, petition is allowed. Sri. H. R. Deshpande, Retd. Dist. Judge, is appointed as the Arbitrator, to adjudicate the dispute between the parties.

¶43

All contentions are kept open.

¶44

Sd/(M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE

¶45

SMM/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5

Sri. Imtiyaz Ahamad S/O Rehmansab Tattimani v. Sri. Naseeruddin S/O Jalaluddin Inamdar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. Imtiyaz Ahamad S/O Rehmansab Tattimani v. Sri. Naseeruddin S/O Jalaluddin Inamdar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shantaram S/O Narayan Hegde, Vs Parameshwar

Sri Uligai Hanumanthappa S.O. Hauligai Kariyappa Vs Smt Garapati Panduranga Mohan Kumar S.O. Late G. Venkaiah

Fakkirayya S/O Siddayya Puranikmath, Vs Rudrayya S/O Shivanandayya Puranikmath

Sri Krisnachand Thaku S/O Indrachand Thakur Vs Smt Deepika Kumari Sing

Smt. Khajabee W/O Rajasab Vs Smt. Vasumathi W/O Arun Apte

Sri. Imtiyaz Ahamad S/O Rehamansab Tattimani Vs Sri. Naseeruddin S/O Jalaluddin Inamdar