Allowed¶31

The Official Liquidator of v. Smt Bhanumathy Chenanda Appaiah

Karnataka HC14 Mar 2025CA/445/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Gateway IT and Travel Solutions Pvt Ltd (in liquidation); Official Liquidator v. Bhanumathy Chenanda Appaiah and Aditya Sidharth; Karnataka High Court; condonation of delay of 1 day; Section 5 Limitation Act 1963; Rule 9 Companies (Court) Rules 1959; Sections 543(1), 458A, 477 Companies Act 1956; recovery of amount due to company in liquidation; Company Application allowed; M.G.S. Kamal J.; order dated 14-03-2025; advocates Jagadeeshgoud Patil and Deepak.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 1 day in filing Company Application No. 328 of 2023 (made under Sections 543(1), 458A and 477 of the Companies Act, 1956 for recovery of amount due to the company in liquidation) condoned; Company Application No. 445 of 2023 accordingly allowed. ¶31

The Official Liquidator of Vs Smt Bhanumathy… — Company and Corporate | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:16085 CA NO.445 OF 2023 IN CA NO.328 OF 2023 IN COP NO.307 OF 2013

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 445 OF 2023

¶6

¶7

COMPANY APPLICATION NO.328 OF 2023

¶8

¶9

COMPANY PETITION NO.307 OF 2013

¶10

BETWEEN:

¶11

THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF M/S GATEWAY IT AND TRAVEL SOLUTIONS, PRIVATE LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) ATTACHED TO HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, "CORPORATE BHAVAN", NO 26-27, 12^TH FLOOR, RAHEJA TOWERS, M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶12

Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

(BY SRI. JAGADEESHGOUD PATIL, ADVOCATE)

¶14

…APPLICANT

¶15

AND:

¶16

SMT BHANUMATHY CHENANDA APPAIAH MANAGING DIRECTOR, W/O KUTTUNGAL SIDHARTHAN, VILLA B-14, STERLING VILLA, GRANDE, KADUGODI, BENGALURU - 560 067.

¶17

SRI. ADITYA SIDHARTH ADDL. DIRECTOR, S/O KUTTUNGAL VASU SIDHARTHAN,

¶18

¶19

NC: 2025:KHC:16085 CA NO.445 OF 2023 IN CA NO.328 OF 2023 IN COP NO.307 OF 2013

¶20

VILLA B-14, STERLING VILLA, GRANDE, KADUGODI, BENGALURU - 560 067.

¶21

…RESPONDENTS

¶22

(BY SRI. DEEPAK, ADVOCATE)

¶23

THIS APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 5 OF THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963 READ WITH RULE 9 OF THE COMPANIES (COURT) RULES, 1959, PRAYING TO CONDONE THE DELAY OF 1 DAY IN FILING THE PRESENT APPLICATION FOR RECOVERY OF AMOUNT DUE TO THE COMPANY (IN LIQUIDATION).

¶24

THIS APPLICATION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL

¶25

ORAL ORDER

¶26

Learned counsel for the applicant-official liquidator has filed Company Application No.445 of 2023 under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 1 day in filing the Company Application No.328 of 2023.

¶27

Heard Sri. Jagadeeshgoud Patil, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri. Deepak, learned counsel for respondents.

¶28

NC: 2025:KHC:16085 CA NO.445 OF 2023 IN CA NO.328 OF 2023 IN COP NO.307 OF 2013

¶29

¶30

Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and accepting the cause shown in the affidavit accompanying application, delay of 1 day in filing the Company Application No.328 of 2023 under Section 543(1) read with Section 458A and 477 of the Companies Act, 1956 is condoned. Accordingly,

¶31

company Application No.445 of 2023 is allowed.

¶32

SD/(M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE

¶33

ARK

The Official Liquidator of v. Smt Bhanumathy Chenanda Appaiah

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Official Liquidator of v. Smt Bhanumathy Chenanda Appaiah

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri B P Kalachar Vs Sri Puttappa

Kotramma Vs R. B. Eshwarappa

Sri Shankar Reddy Vs Sri N Narayana

Sri. Y Raghuram Shenoy Vs Puttur Town Municipal Council

Mahesh Shetty Thimarodi Vs Smt. Meera T. Shetty

Venkateshappa Vs Sakamma (Dead)