Writ petition under Article 227 praying to quash an order was heard. The court noted the original suit was decreed, rendering the prayer infructuous. The petition was disposed of without granting any specific relief.
The writ petition stands disposed of as the prayer has become infructuous due to the decree in the original suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:34018 WP No. 9891 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 9891 OF 2021 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
N L MAHADEVAPPA S/O NAMYA NAIKA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O 3RD CROSS, SATHYASHRAYA, KANAKA NAGARA EXTENSION, OLD TOWN, BHADRAVATHI 577301
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRASAD B S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ROOPESH N S/O NAMYA NAIKA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O 311, 9TH MAIN, BRINDAVANA EXTENSION, 1ST STAGE, MYSORE 20
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. GAURAV G K., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 27.08.2020 IN O.S.NO.36/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHADRAVATHI AS FOUND AT ANNEXURE-E AND GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY OF ORDER DATED 27.8.2020 IN O.S.NO.36/2004 ON THE
FILE OF THE I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHADRAVATHI PENDING DISPOSAL OF THE WRIT PETITION AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS
ORAL ORDER
Learned Counsel for the respondent submits that the original suit from out of which the present writ petition arises viz., O.S.No.36/2004 has been decreed on 13.01.2023 and therefore, the prayer made in the petition
has become infructuous .
3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of,
for the reasons stated above.
Sd/(R DEVDAS) JUDGE
CT: JL
JT/-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N L Mahadevappa
Roopesh N
R Devas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
