Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Rajesh Babu Vs Leela Rashmi — Matrimonial and Divorce | Karnataka HC (2024)

Home
Karnataka HC
2024
Rajesh Babu Vs Leela RashmiRajesh Babu v. Leela Rashmi

Dismissed

Rajesh Babu v. Leela Rashmi

Karnataka HC3 Jun 2024WP/9801/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Karnataka dismissed two writ petitions filed under Article 227 as infructuous, as the main petition was already disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Dismissed both writ petitions as infructuous.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

1 - NC: 2024:KHC:18761 WP No. 9801 of 2017 C/W WP No. 9802 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 3^RD DAY OF JUNE, 2024

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 9801 OF 2017 (GM-FC) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 9802 OF 2017 (GM-FC)

IN W.P.NO.9801/2017

BETWEEN:

RAJESH BABU AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, S/O ROBERT R/AT NO.2, NANJAPPA GARDEN VANAREPT BANGALORE-560 095

…PETITIONER

(BY SMT. RAMA R. IYER, ADVOCATE)

AND:

Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
RAJESH BABU
respondent
LEELA RASHMI

Coram

AI extract

LALITHA KANNEGANTI

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Karnataka HC
Decided on: 3 Jun 2024 · June
Registered: 3 Mar 2017
Case no.: WP/9801/2017

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Lalitha Kanneganti

Smt Roopa G K Vs Suresh P
25 Apr 2024
Lashmi Bai Ravindrapandian Vs Mr. Gokul Rajesh Ponthiagaraj
25 Apr 2024
Smt Nikita Pai B Vs Sri Raviteja Kamath B.K
25 Apr 2024
Smt Vasudha Reddy Vs S Jayasimha
3 Jun 2024

Cite this judgement

Rajesh Babu v. Leela Rashmi, WP/9801/2017 (KA), decided on 3 June 2024.

The High Court of Karnataka publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

LALITHA KANNEGANTI

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed both writ petitions as infructuous.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

These writ petitions were filed under Article 226/227 praying to quash an order in G & WC No.50/2013. The petitioner submitted that since the main petition is disposed of, the current matters have become infructuous. The High Court dismissed both writ petitions as infructuous without further discussion.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

LEELA RASHMI AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, D/O P.LAKSHMANA R/AT NO.23, 2^ND CROSS, CHURCH STREET, 6^TH BLCOK, ANNEX, KORAMANGALA BANGALORE-560 095

…RESPONDENT (BY SRI.HEMANTH KUMAR D., ADVOCATE)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD.31.1.2017 ON THE I.A.NO.10 FILED UNDER SECTION 151 OF CPC IN G & WC NO.50/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BANGALORE VIDE ANNEXURE-E.

2 -

NC: 2024:KHC:18761 WP No. 9801 of 2017 C/W WP No. 9802 of 2017

IN W.P.NO.9802/2017

BETWEEN:

RAJESH BABU AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, S/O. ROBERT, R/AT NO.2, NANJAPPA GARDEN, VANARPET,

BANGALORE-560 095.

…PETITIONER

(BY SMT. RAMA R. IYER, ADVOCATE)

AND:

LEELA RASHMI

AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, D/O. P. LAKSHMANA, R/AT NO. 23, 2^ND CROSS, CHURCH STREET, 6^TH BLOCK, ANNEX,

KORAMANGALA,

BANGALORE-560 095

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI.HEMANTH KUMAR D., ADVOCATE)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD.31.01.2017 ON THE I.A.NO.11 FILED UNDER SECTION 151 OF CPC IN G & WC NO.50/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BANGALORE VIDE ANNEXURE-E.

THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

3 - NC: 2024:KHC:18761 WP No. 9801 of 2017 C/W WP No. 9802 of 2017

ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the main petition is disposed off and this matter has become infructuous.

Accordingly, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as infructuous.

SD/JUDGE

MEG

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14

CNR

KAHC010029422017

Topic

Matrimonial and Divorce

Bench

Lalitha Kanneganti

Disposal

DISMISSED

H Manjunath Vs Chandana Alias Mrs R Chandana/Chandana Manjunath/

3 Jun 2024

Vijaykumar Bedre Vs Roopashree

3 Jun 2024