Petitioners filed a writ petition seeking to quash an impugned order regarding alleged forfeiture of land. The petition was subsequently withdrawn by the petitioners themselves via a filed memo.
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 9226 OF 2018 (SC-ST)
BETWEEN:
SRI SRINIVAS SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR’S
P(a) SMT. HEMAVATHI W/O LATE SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/ESIDING AT NO.48/15 19TH MAIN ROAD, 1ST CROSS NEAR UDAYA SCHOOL 1ST CROSS MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA BANGALORE 560 040
Digitally signed by NARAYANAPPA LAKSHMAMMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
P(b) SMT. S. SUMA VENKATARAJU W/O SRI. R. VENKATARAJU D/O LATE SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT NO.48/15, 19TH MAIN NEAR UDAYA SCHOOL, 1ST CROSS MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA BANGALORE – 560 040
P(c) SMT.JAYALAKSHMI W/O SRI.SOMASHEKAR L. D/O LATE SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT NO.196/1, HEGGANAHALLI PEENYA 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE – 560 091
… PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. VENKATACHALAPATHI S K., ADV.)
AND:
TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT 5TH FLOOR, MULTI STORIED BUILDING DR B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE 560 001
RESPONDENT NOS.5 TO 11 ARE R/AT NO.159, 2ND CROSS KOGILU VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M N RAMESH FOR C/R5; SMT.SAVITHRAMMA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3; SRI.SHIVAGONDAPPA S. ZULAPI, ADV. FOR R4; SRI. B.RAMESH, ADV. FOR R6 TO R11; SRI. M.N.MUNIREDDY FOR PROPOSED R12 ON IA 2/2022)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR ENTIRE RECORDS ON THE FILE OF RESPONDENT NO.2 VIDE ORDER DATED 15.12.2017 AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND ON THE FILE OF RESPONDENT NO.3 IN CASE VIDE ORDER DATED 29.09.2009 AS PER ANNEXURE-E AND IN CASE VIDE ORDER DATED 17.07.2015 AS PER ANNEXURE-F ETC.
QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IN APPEAL DATED 15.12.2017 IN RESPECT OF LAND TO AN EXTENT OF A1-00 IN SY.NO.100/P20 OF KOGILU VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH (ADDL) TALUK VIDE ANNEXUREA.GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IN APPEAL DATED 15.12.2017 SO FAR RELATES TO THE FORFEITURE OF LAND TO AN EXTENT OF A1-00 IN SY.NO.100/P20 OF KOGILU VILLAGE, VIDE ANNEXURE-A TILL THE DISPOSAL OF THE ABOVE WRIT PETITION.OFFICE NOTE-------THE ABOVE WRIT PETITION PAPERS WERE NOTIFIED ON 01.03.2018 FOR RECTIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING OFFICE OBJECTIONS -1.ENTIRE WP TO BE SIGN BY COUNSEL 2.PARA NOS. TO BE CORRECTLY MENTIONED 3.TRUE/ORIGINAL TO BE MENTIONED CORRECTLY IN ANNEXURE 4.ALL ANNEXURE TO BE FILLED WITH OATH COMMISSIONER SEALS 5.INDEX TO BE FILLED WITH PAGE NOS. 6.COPY TO BE SERVED ON CAVEATOR AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE FILED 7.AGE PROOF OF PETITIONER TO
NC: 2024:KHC:22479 WP No. 9226 of 2018
BE FURNISHED.8.ALL ANNEXURE TO BE ATTESTED AS TRUE COPY BY COUNSEL.9.PINCODE OF R5 IN CAUSE TITLEAS NOTED IN THE EXAMINATION REPORT AND THE SAME IS NOTIFIED IN THE RETURN REGISTER. THOUGH THREE WEEKS OR 21 DAYS ARE ELAPSED, THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER HAS NOT COMPLIED THE OFFICE OBJECTIONS NOTED THEREIN.POST WP BEFORE REGISTRAR [J] FOR ORDERS [REG. NON-COMPLIANCE OF OFFICE OBJECTIONS] VIDE RULE 17 CHAPTER XII OF HIGH COURT RULES ALOGN WITH CAVEAT PETITIN NO.158/2018. v DTD 05.06.2018.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
WHEREFORE, per above named humbly prays that this Hon’ble court be pleased to call for entire records on the file of Respondent No. 2 in case No KSC/ST (A) 102/2015-16, vide order dated: 15/12/2017 as per Annexure - A and on the file of Respondent No.3 in case of KSC/ST (A) 30/2006-07 vide order dated: 29/09/2009 as per Annexure-E and in case No. KSC/ST (A) 14/201314 vide order dated 17/07/2015 as per Annexure-F.
petitioner, signed by the petitioner No.1 (a to c) as
NC: 2024:KHC:22479 WP No. 9226 of 2018
also the counsel for the petitioner, which reads as
under;
Memo
“That the LR's of Petitioner No.1(a) to (c) above named humbly prays that this Hon’ble court, as the petitioners are not interested to proceed with the matter hence the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Hence this memo”.
counsel for the petitioner. The petition is dismissed
as withdrawn .
does not survive for consideration. Hence, IA stands dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
SR
CT:HS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5
Sri Srinivas Since Dead by his LR's
The State of Karnataka
The Deputy Commissioner Bangalore Urban District
The Assistant Commissioner Bangalore North
Sri Appaiah @ Muni Anjanappa
Sri Ramachandra Since Deceased by his LR
Suraj Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
