Petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 seeking quashing of a short-term tender notification. The court held the petition had become infructuous due to subsequent developments and dismissed it.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
WRIT PETITION No. 8873 OF 2020 (GM-TEN)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI KATTI HARI RAGHAVENDRA RAO, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by VALLI MARIMUTHU Location: High Court of Karnataka
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI S.H. RAGHAVENDRA, AGA FOR R1; SRI K.B. MONESH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
NC: 2024:KHC:23272 WP No. 8873 of 2020
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI THERE BY TO QUASH THE SHORT TERM TENDER NOTIFICATION BEARING No.EE 3/SWM/TEND/01/ 2020-21 DATED 18/06/2020 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A ALONG WITH THE WRIT PETITION.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The present writ petition seeking following reliefs:
learned counsel for the petitioner that in view of the subsequent developments, the writ petition has rendered infructuous.
VBS/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7
Sd/JUDGE
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Venkatappa Ananda Services Pvt. Ltd.
State of Karnataka
The Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike
Executive Engineer SWM-1, The Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike
K. V. Aravind
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
