Writ petition against State of Karnataka and Bangalore Development Authority was dismissed as withdrawn after the petitioner filed a memo seeking withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:18571 WP No. 8812 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF MAY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 8812 OF 2023 (BDA)
BETWEEN:
A. ANANTHALAKSHMI, D/O M. ADINARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT. NO.179, NEW NO.19, 5TH MAIN, 7TH CROSS, AMBEDKAR NAGAR, SRIRAMPURA, BANGALORE - 560 021.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SATHISHA D.J., ADVOCATE) AND:
Digitally signed by V MANJUSHA BAI Location: High Court of Karnataka
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. YOGESH D.NAIK, AGA FOR R1; SRI. H.T. BASAVARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
NC: 2024:KHC:18571 WP No. 8812 of 2023
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 18.06.2021 AT ANNEXURE-K TO THE R2 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed memo dated 29.05.2024 with a prayer to withdraw the appeal.
2. Memo is taken on record.
Hence, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn .
Sd/JUDGE
GPG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1
A. Ananthalakshmi
State of Karnataka, Ministry of Urban Development
Bangalore Development Authority
M.I.Arun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
