Petitioners sought a direction to the Bangalore Development Authority to consider their representations for allotment of an alternative site of same measurement in another BDA layout. The High Court, without expressing any opinion on merits, directed the BDA to consider the representations within four months and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:52482 WP No. 8752 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.8752 OF 2021 (BDA)
BETWEEN:
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.79, RR LAYOUT, K. NO.49/20, 3RD CROSS, VARANASI, BENGALURU - 560036.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. MUNIYAPPA.,ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA
Location: High Court of Karnataka
AND:
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES TO CONSIDER THE
REPRESENTATION DATED 03.01.2018 AND 26.09.2019 VIDE ANNEXURE-K AND M MADE BY THE PETITIONERS AND TO ALLOT AN ALTERNATIVE SITE OF SAME MEASUREMENT IN SOME OTHER LAYOUT FORMED BY THE BDA.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
NC: 2024:KHC:52482 WP No. 8752 of 2021
expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, respondent-Bangalore Development Authority is directed to consider the representations 03.01.2018 and 27.09.2019 (Annexure-K and M) within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order in accordance with law. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of .
SD/(E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28
SB
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the BDA should be directed to consider the petitioners' representations seeking allotment of an alternative site of same measurement in another BDA layout.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri. K. Pratesh Kumar
Smt. Girija Pratesh
The Commissioner, Bengaluru Development Authority
E.S. Indiresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
