This is a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, appearing for default as the petitioner did not contest. The petition was dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:18911 WP No. 865 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 865 OF 2023 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
MR CHIDANANDA N
SON OF SRI PARAMESHWARA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RESIDING AT 3-220 NADTHOTA HOUSE BILINELE KAIKAMBA BILINELE PUTTUR DAKSHIN KANNADA 574238
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PARASHURAM A L., ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
Digitally signed by NARASIMHA MURTHY VANAMALA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BANGALORE 560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER
NC: 2024:KHC:18911 WP No. 865 of 2023
BANGALORE 560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. NAVEEN CHANDRASHEKAR, AGA)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH COMMUNICATION DATED 15.11.22 ADDRESSED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SKILL DEVELOPMENT ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND LIVELIHOOD-R1 TO R2 AND THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON 09.11.22 (ANNEXURE-A).
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
None appears for the petitioner. The office
objections have not been attended to over the last twelve and odd months. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition stands dismissed for default.
Sd/JUDGE
RB
MR CHIDANANDA N
STATE OF KARNATAKA
B M SHYAM PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
