Dismissed

Sri Harish v. Vs the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC19 Nov 2024WP/8600/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition filed under Article 226, the High Court of Karnataka heard arguments regarding directions against State and BMP officials. The petitioner sought liberty to withdraw the petition to explore other legal remedies. The court allowed this request.

What did the court decide?

Liberty reserved to withdraw the petition and prosecute other remedies; petition dismissed as withdrawn.

Sri Harish v Vs the State of Karnataka — Service and Employment | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

1 - NC: 2024:KHC:46683 WP No. 8600 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024 BEFORE

¶3

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8600 OF 2024 (LB-BMP)

¶4

BETWEEN:

¶5

SRI HARISH V S/O LATE VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS PRESIDENT HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION AND CORRUPTION CONTROL FORUM NO. 12, 1^ST CROSS, MADURA NAGAR MANASA NAGAR NAGARABHAVI

¶6

BENGALURU-560072.

¶7

…PETITIONER

¶8

(BY SRI. GANGADHARAIAH A N.,ADVOCATE)

¶9

AND:

¶10

Digitally signed by ANAND N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶11

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560001.

¶12

THE BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE A BODY CORPORATE HAVING OFFICE AT CORPORATION CIRCLE BENGALURU-560002 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

¶13

2 - NC: 2024:KHC:46683 WP No. 8600 of 2024

¶14

THE ASST. REVENUE OFFICER CHANDRA LAYOUT SUB DIVISION BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE PALIKE SOUDHA, 2^ND FLOOR SIDDAGANGA SCHOOL ROAD 14^TH CROSS CHANDRA LAYOUT 1^ST STAGE BENGALURU.

¶15

THE SENIOR SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE OF SRIRAMAPURAM SUB REGISTRAR SRIRAMAPURA BENGALURU.

¶16

SMT B PUSHPALATHA W/O LATE B T MALLIKARJUNA

¶17

SRI B M RAHUL S/O LATE B T MALLIKARJUNA

¶18

SRI B M NAKUL S/O LATE B T MALLIKARJUNA

¶19

RESPONDENTS NO. 5 TO 7 ARE R/A 1^ST FLOOR, 6^TH CROSS SUBBAREDDY BUILDING BEHIND PVS NURSING HOME JCR EXTENSION CHITRADURGA.

¶20

SREE SHREESHAILA MALLIKARJUNA ENTERPRISES MATHAPITHRU KRUPA, 6^TH CROSS FLAT NO.ASST. NO.634/33 VASU NIVAS, NEAR HUDA PARK

¶21

3 - NC: 2024:KHC:46683 WP No. 8600 of 2024

¶22

M J NAGAR, BDCC BANK COLONY HOSPET-583201 VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT.

¶23

SMT K M SHANKRAMMA @ SHANTHAMMA W/O MALLIKARJUNA KURUDAGI,

¶24

SRI KURADAGI MANJUNATH S/O KURADAGI MALLIKARJUNA

¶25

SRI K M PRASHANTH KUMAR S/O K MALLIKARJUNA

¶26

9 TO 11 ARE R/A 29TH WARD, 6^TH CROSS VASU NIVAS, NEAR HUDA PARK M J NAGAR BDCC BANK COLONY HOSPET-583201 VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT.

¶27

SRI RAHUL NAKHUDA S/O RAHAMAN NAKHUDA ABDUL 33 AND 34, R R RESIDENCY FLAT NO.102, 1^ST FLOOR VENKATAPPA STREET TASKER TOWN BENGALURU NORTH, H K P ROAD BENGALURU-560051.

¶28

SRI VINOD KUMAR S/O LATE JACOB NO. 759, 21^ST WARD NEAR VADAKARYA TEMPLE MAIN BAZAR HOSPET-583201 VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT.

¶29

4 - NC: 2024:KHC:46683 WP No. 8600 of 2024

¶30

SRI R SAILESH S/O RIKAB CHAND NO. 282, 20^TH WARD NEAR ESHWARA TEMPLE OLD MEDAR ROAD HOSPET-583201 VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT.

¶31

…RESPONDENTS

¶32

(BY SMT.SPOORTHI V, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. PAWAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

¶33

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) DIRECTING THE R1 TO 3 TO TAKE APPROPRIATE AND SUITABLE ACTION AGAINST THE ERRING OFFICIALS OF THE BBMP IN NOT VERIFYING THE DEFICIT TAX ASSESSED BY THE R5 TO 7 AND NOT PROVIDING REQUESTED DETAILS TO THE PETITIONER ON HIS RTI APPLICATIONS; B) DIRECTING THE R1 TO TAKE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE ACTION AGAINST THE R4 FOR NOT FOLLOWING THE LEGAL PROCEDURE IN GETTING THE SALE DEED REGISTERED; C) DIRECTING THE R4 TO RECALL THE DIGITAL COPY OF THE REGISTERED SALE DEED DATED 06/01/2024 EXECUTED BY R5 TO 7 IN FAVOUR OF RESPONDENTS 8 TO 14 REGISTERED BEFORE R4 AT ANNEXURE-K.

¶34

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶35

5 - NC: 2024:KHC:46683 WP No. 8600 of 2024

¶36

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD

¶37

ORAL ORDER

¶38

After arguing the matter for some time, Sri A N Gangadharaiah, the learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks liberty to withdraw the petition and prosecute the remedies otherwise permissible in law including the remedies as a public spirited person.

¶39

Subject to all just exceptions, liberty is reserved accordingly, and the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

¶40

SD/(B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE

¶41

AN/-

Sri Harish v. Vs the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Harish v. Vs the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri. H. M. Krishna Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt Priyanka M Vs State of Karnataka

Sri. H.R. Lokesh, Vs State of Karnataka

M/S Vishnu Priya Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Thrilok Chandar Vs the Commissioner

Sri Jagadish J Sule Vs the Commissioner