Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 seeking direction for demolition of illegal structure was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner in person, citing that respondent Nos. 6-8 had vacated the set-back premises.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
WRIT PETITION NO. 8545 OF 2024 (LB-BMP)
BETWEEN:
MR. HUSSAIN SHARIFF S/O LATE ABDUL WAHAB, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO 13, 1ST FLOOR, MASJID STREET, CIVIL STATION, NEELASANDRA, BENGALURU 560047
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VIJAYA KRISHNA BHAT M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by R DEEPA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENGALURU 560002
AUSTIN TOWN, BENGALURU 560047
RESPONDENT Nos.6 TO 8 ARE RESIDING AT NO 9, 5TH MAIN, KEMPAIAH BLOCK, J C NAGAR, BENGALURU 560006
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PAWAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3 SRI. ASHWIN G RAJ & YATHISH S, ADVOCATE FOR R4 & R5 SRI. B.L. SANJEEV, ADVOCATE FOR R5 (VK NOT FILED) V/O DATED 21.08.2024 SERVICE OF NOTICE IS H/S FOR R6 TO R8)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT OR ORDER DIRECTING THE R-1 TO 3 TO INITIATE APPROPRIATE ACTION FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ORDER OF CONFIRMATION DTD 16.08.2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-G, AEE/D/10/04/2023.24 AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION FOR DEMOLITION OF THE ILLEGAL STRUCTURE CONSTRUCTED OVER SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner appearing through video conferencing identifies the petitioner/party-inperson. The petitioner/party-in-person is present and filed a memo stating that respondent Nos.6 to 8 have left set back towards the petitioner's building. In view of the same, the petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition as not pressed.
Memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
SKS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
MR. HUSSAIN SHARIFF S/O LATE ABDUL WAHAB
THE COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE
THE JOINT COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE
THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELEC) AUSTIN TOWN O AND M UNIT, BESCOM
THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WATER SUPPLY AND SANITARY SUB DIVISION, BWSSB
ASHOK S.KINAGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
